SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Eddy who wrote (987)1/29/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Clayleas  Respond to of 9818
 
This just out from the Federal Reserve

Release Date: January 28, 1998

For immediate release

The Federal Reserve Board announced today that the Reserve Banks will adhere to a standard holiday schedule next year and remain open for normal operations on December 31, 1999.

Although various financial and trade groups have been considering whether a banking holiday on December 31, 1999, would ease potential disruptions that may be caused by the century date change, the Board believes that a banking holiday is not warranted.

The Board said bank resources would be better spent preparing for the year 2000 change-over rather than addressing the operating, financial, legal and other consequences that would flow from a date-change holiday.

As part of its year 2000 preparations, the Federal Reserve plans a comprehensive program for banks to test computers used for Fedwire transfers, automated clearing house transactions, and other central bank services for compliance with the date change.

A schedule will be issued shortly with actual testing beginning at mid-year and continuing through 1999. This program will permit banks to send test transactions across a variety of dates pertaining to the century date change. Testing for depository institutions will be coordinated through their district Federal Reserve Banks.


bog.frb.fed.us



To: David Eddy who wrote (987)1/29/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: sibe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9818
 
IBM may be sued for causing the Y2k problem.

You wrote, "On what basis?

If I make a hammer & you buy it & then kill your mother with it, am I
libel for having manufactured that hammer?

We kill 40,000+ people year-in & year-out with cars (& alcohol)... I
haven't heard of Detroit needing to defend itself as maker of murder
weapons."

If you knowingly sold me a defective hammer and that caused a problem, I may have a case. But I guess that's what the lawyers will be arguing.

People also voluntarily smoke, but the tobacco companies are now paying for the health problems and deaths.




To: David Eddy who wrote (987)1/30/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: Terry Maynard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
Please don't give lawyers any ideas.(G)

Terry