Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tokyo VD who wrote (2132)	1/29/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: Dauntless	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7041

More confusion - RE: >>If your ties to Zonagen were so obvious, then why did four or five people sound surprised when I posted the same information?<< Why are you asking me - ask them. Am I responsible if they don't read the thread? RE: >>While you admit you are not a scientist, you feel comfortable discussing the analytic tools used to assay phentolamine in the different studies you've cited. You also have had the time to obtain studies that support your opinion. << I am not a scientist - however, I got a pretty good engineering education & have worked in the medical industry for more than 20 years. I work in the immediate vicintiy of the Texas Medical Center. It's about a 2 minute walk to the medical library of the Baylor College of Medicine. This is not rocket science. BTW, how come you can possess documents, lawsuits, patent aps, etc. & it's not a problem? How do we know you're not working with Asensio? RE: >>I now believe that you are acting as a mouthpiece for Zonagen to defend themselves from this attack by Asensio (by the way, I've never condoned any information in Asensio's releases, but they sure have shed more light on this drug and its development). It's fine if you are protecting your friends/former co-workers, but at least be upfront about it. You can believe what you want. How much more upfront can I be - I have reacted to dishonest attacks on people & an organization that I know. I have stated this many times on this thread. Since the rest of your post didn't implicate me, I have no comment. But when are you going to provide your information. If I am pro Zona, you must qualify as an adversary. ALL my information is public - what about you - how do we know who you are? At this point, after what you've demanded of me, if you want to be credible you should provide the same information.