Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zamboz who wrote (162129)	9/2/2020 4:31:04 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By zamboz Respond to of 218775

Continuing to massively short TSLA But practicing the dangerous game safely Like wearing prophylactic whilst napping, just in case The Fed is doing a terribly bad bad thing, that which has a cost, especially as the money so printed into existence are actually being spent on groceries None are talking about the cost. ‘They’ are not even counting. For every $100 of TSLA short calls, am long SLV puts $5.00, because TSLA is more volatile than gold, and silver is also more volatile than gold but less juicy than TSLA Am watching AAPL w/ interest, since Pompeo & Navarro, together w/ Bannon, are philosophically wishing to crater China China China, neither realizing nor caring that China is more resilient than AAPL, and thinking that should AAPL crater, only AAPL management would be blamed Trump likely doing his NYC real estate thing, but maybe thinking the consequences can always be fixed. I hope Nasdaq investors would understand that the war is for their own good. Unlike the hot wars of the past, J6P tee-ed up, big time.