SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1259983)9/5/2020 11:52:01 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576350
 
Biden signs: I Believe in Science

unfortunately, Biden supporters get science from CNN

===

spectator.co.uk

Coronavirus cases are mounting but deaths remain stable. Why?

1 September 2020, 4:15am

Something rather odd is happening in the two Europeans nations worst hit by Covid-19. The UK and Italy have a rising number of cases but a stable and very low number of deaths, even weeks after the cases started rising again.

At the time of writing, the UK records 1750 new cases daily and one death in a population of 67 million. With a roughly similar population and an average of 602 cases a day, Italy has had just over four deaths a day over the last month. The ratio of cases to deaths is nowhere near what it was at the height of the pandemic. The other notable feature is a shift of cases to a younger population.

There can be several explanations for this trend. First, the viral agent may have mutated to a less virulent form. Although there are some published studies showing minor mutations, these are what you would expect from an RNA virus which is inherently unstable (think of the influenza viruses, which perpetually change their suits).

Second, we may have got better at dealing with Covid-19. Apart from dexamethasone in the small population admitted to intensive care units, there are no specific treatments for the disease, and as we are not observing a substantial increase in admissions or severity of the disease, this seems also an unlikely explanation.

Third, our preventive measures may have worked, only allowing new cases when lapses have occurred. If this were the case we would expect effectiveness against all forms of acute respiratory infections, like the winter illnesses. This has indeed happened in the Southern hemisphere, but the age shift does not fit with this theory.

A fourth possible and much more complex explanation is what we call the 'reality problem'. There is rapidly accumulating evidence that the tests used worldwide to identify cases in a binary mode 'Yes or No' are being used in a simplistic and uncoordinated way. We have already explained the limits of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to carry out mass testing.

PCR is a very sensitive test, which means that it detects the smallest fragments of the virus it is looking for by amplifying the sample millions of times. However, a fragment is not a whole virus, capable of replication and of infecting other human beings. It is a small part of the viral structure that the PCR primer is looking for, not the whole microorganism. Only whole viruses can infect us.

In addition, the number of amplification cycles necessary to reach a 'positive test' is rarely reported. We now know that his is a vital piece of information in interpreting results. A very high number of cycles may detect fragments and give a positive result but a lower number of cycles is far more likely to identify infected and infectious individuals requiring quarantine.

You would expect all of this to be reported in a PCR results but it is not routinely done. There is worse news to come. A very sensitive test is vulnerable to contamination with extraneous genetic material (hence the need for suiting up operators). The rapid expansion of testing capacity may have degraded our capacity for sterility by increasing throughput and straining lab staff training. We also have come across studies looking at the different performance of PCR kits on the same sample and the results are not encouraging, with wide variation in cycle thresholds for the same positive results indicating the absolute requirement to standardised tests worldwide continuously comparing procedures and performance of testing against the only real gold standard for gauging a person’s contagiousness: viral culture.

Evidence is mounting that a good proportion of 'new' mild cases and people re-testing positives after quarantine or discharge from hospital are not infectious, but are simply clearing harmless virus particles which their immune system has efficiently dealt with. Those whose immunity is more active are exactly in the age group of observed 'positives' and least likely to end with severe disease.

So, we appear to have the reality of viral circulation, probably waning fast and the perceived reality of a misused and simply interpreted genial test which can be used to great effect when viral circulation is far higher (making it more likely a positive test correctly identifies the virus) or in finding traces of bugs which are good at hiding in our bodies, or their fragments in waste waters indicating their presence at some time in the past.

To avoid this dual reality and the dangers of isolating non-infectious people or whole communities we need an international effort to standardise testing, periodic calibration against culture or other recognised measures of infectiousness and strict laboratory protocols and procedures probably with a central licensing authority. A lot more work needs to be done to correlate cycle thresholds, patients’ characteristics and intelligence on virus circulation. Medicine and public health are about people, not printouts.

Written by Prof Carl Heneghan & Tom JeffersonCarl Heneghan is professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford and director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Tom Jefferson is a senior associate tutor and honorary research fellow at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1259983)9/6/2020 1:56:48 AM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576350
 
Jews, Remember Khaybar!
Posted on September 4, 2020



Long-time (or Islam-savvy) readers will remember the infamous Muslim chant: Khaybar, Khaybar ya yahud, jaysh Muhammad qadimun. These words celebrate the mass slaughter of Jews at Khaybar by the prophet Mohammed. Chanting them is a favorite pastime of Hizb ut-Tahrir, among other Islamic zealots.

The Khaybar chant was featured again recently in the southern Swedish city of Malmö. Many thanks to FouseSquawk for translating this article from Expressen:

Jew-hatred during rioting in Malmö: “Want to kill Jews”

September 1, 2020

Unverified videos have circulated on social media since Friday, and now Kvällsposten can confirm that hate against Jews occurred in connection with the riot.

One young man became upset and said, “This isn’t my demonstration any longer, now they want to kill Jews,” says Victor Pressfeldt, who himself was a witness to the anti-Semitic aspects.

In the videos a small crowd can be seen with clenched fists screaming in Arabic, “Jews, remember Khaybar, Mohammad’s armies are returning.”

According to the Jewish Central Council, the meaning cannot be interpreted other than a call for the “murder and cleansing of Jews,” as Khaybar was a place where Jews were murdered by the Prophet Mohammad and his followers in the year 628 AD.

According to persons who were at the scene in Rosengård on Friday evening, the Jewish Central Council seems to be justified in its interpretation.

The freelance journalist Victor Pressfeldt was on the scene and followed the events during the entire afternoon into the night going into Saturday, and he confirms that he heard the anti-Semitic rhyme being chanted during the evening.

“Yes, I heard it on at least a couple of occasions. There was a guy who translated it for me from Arabic, and he himself was very upset over what was being shouted.” He said, “Now it isn’t my demonstration any longer — now they want to kill Jews.” I thought it was creepy.

“Islamists and ISIS— followers seemed to be moving among the demonstrators”

According to Victor Pressfeldt, there were several in the area who reacted to the anti-Semitism, but also to the views of the religious extremists in the crowd.

“There were several I talked to who were upset that Islamists and ISIS-followers seemed to be moving among the demonstrators. So I would say that there were internal tensions both among those who took part in the demonstrations and those who took part in the riot.”

Police are aware of the videos that are circulating, and are now investigating the matter as a suspected hate crime.

“We have initiated our own police report, and the Jewish congregation has also made a report about it,” says Ewa-Gun Westford, press spokesperson with the Malmö police.

Is there any video that has been verified yet?

“I cannot verify that at this time, but we are gathering reports, and an investigation will take place.”

Fredrik Sieraszki, a spokesperson for the Jewish congregation in Malmö, thinks that the incidents indicate Malmö has a long way to go to overcome the anti-Semitism that still flourishes in the city.

“Obviously, we think this is uncomfortable. And obviously, there is discomfort in our congregation since we have surely heard this before This is a sign that we have a long way to go in Malmö. We must work hard on these questions, and that is not something someone does on a coffee break.”

“I saw the clips, and I was furious.”

In recent years, the rabbi of the Jewish congregation, Moshe-David HaCohen, together with Imam Salahuddin Barakat, have worked actively for increased understanding among different religious groups in Malmö, and Fredrik Sieradski is careful to point out the importance of not speculating as to who is behind the content of the videos.

“We are in contact with the Muslim network and are having discussions as to how we will do further work on these questions. The absolute last thing we will do right now is speculate.”

An imam who spends a lot of time in Rosengård, and who also was at the scene during the disturbances on Friday, is Samir Muric. He says that he himself didn’t hear any anti-Semitic slogans, but that he saw a clip of it on Facebook.

“I saw the clip and was furious. I really hope they find out who it is and that they are convicted for hate against a group of people. I have also emailed the Jewish congregation to show my empathy for them,” he says.

“Surprised when I heard the anger directed at Jews”

The Malmö resident Salomea Gosenius, 20 years old, has long been engaged with Jewish life in Malmö. Before Friday, she felt anxious, and on Saturday her anxiety was increased.

“I was ready for what might happen because it is totally common that this problem crosses over into Jew-hatred. But I am clearly so surprised that it came from the counter-demonstrators’ side, since both Muslims and Jews are a target group for right-wing extremists. We are sitting in the same boat, so therefore I was a little surprised when I heard the anger directed specifically against Jews.”

Salomea Gosenius says that she is one of many others who fight to keep young Jews in Malmö. The weekend’s incidents she considers a step back for the future of Jews in the city.

“These kinds of incidents with concrete threats only makes things go the wrong way. We Jews in Malmö have already experienced so much, and this only worsens the situation. As the people become more afraid, they will flee.”



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1259983)9/6/2020 2:28:42 AM
From: Winfastorlose3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
IC720
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576350
 
Now that you have found out you are hopelessly (systemically) racist, what are you going to do about it? There is no cure. It is a condition of birth.