SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/16/2020 5:54:10 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218009
 
Re <<NZ>>

... have friend's open invite to NZ bloomberg.com

... have invites to Honolulu, Maui, Penang, S of France, etc etc

the issue is where to store the gold?

If the gold really ought to stay in HK, then I best either set up plan-B on or get open invite to Lamma Island

Speaking of gold, I was curious and as had not revalued the barbarous element for awhile, plugged in the latest Bloomberg number and find am up (based on the first time I did laborious inventory late last year) ~35%

Very nice number for savings 'growth' in dollar terms, albeit the ounces remained exactly as was, adjusting for new savings in metallic form.

I mean to add a bit more to the savings in ounces as soon as TSLA rewards me in well-deserved realised gains, hard earned, by on-line gaming not different from "the last of us 2"




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/16/2020 10:02:16 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 218009
 
People actually do think those various things you mentioned would be a good thing. Advocates and operators of them even fancy themselves as cognitive elites doing esoteric financial relativity theory high IQ econometrics beyond the intellectual horsepower of regular humans, when they are really no better or different from assignat creators or Zimbabwe dilutionistas.

Never, ever forget Long Term Capital Management and its Nobelistas or that there is nothing new under the Sun.

en.wikipedia.org



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/20/2020 5:12:10 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218009
 
Re <<laugh>>

twitter.com




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/20/2020 5:34:45 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218009
 
cathie wood is also correct, along w/ Michael Burry of "the big short"

zerohedge.com

ARK Funds Added More Tesla This Month As Cathie Wood Was "Happy" To See Shares "Get Slapped"


Cathie Wood of ARK Invest - who appears to us to have basically made a name for herself by betting that the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have no interest in doing their job when it comes to anything associated with Elon Musk - said last week she was "happy" to see Tesla shares "get slapped" and was, of course, buying more.

The head of ARK Invest was not phased by an $82 billion drawdown in Tesla's market cap over the course of just one trading day. In true @BagholderQuotes fashion, she instead reminded the market of the age old Buffett adage of "you don't loose if you don't sell" by buying even more shares.



“We wait for those sorts of days where there is outright fear," she said of a company participating in an index that has doubled off its lows in less than 6 months thanks to a Fed and Softbank induced manipulation frenzy. "If we think the stock has dropped enough, we’ll move in, and we did.”

"I was happy to see it get slapped," she commented.

Tesla was, in fact, slapped this month, falling 21% after it was announced that the company was snubbed for entry into the S&P 500. Wood says she used that as an "opportunity" to boost ARKK's $8.4 billion ETF's position in the name to 10.7% from 9.9%. Shares are up almost 35% since then, once again validating Wood's investment strategy, which appears to be betting that economic reality as it relates to public companies no longer exists.

Also furthering that line of thinking are various sell side "visionaries" who have all raised price targets ahead of Tesla's Battery Day event. We're guessing they haven't learned much from the company's Solar Roof reveal, but we digress...

Wood's funds have been top performers this year; ARKK and ARKW have returned more than 78% so far in 2020.



Wood called the bounce in shares "a sign of resiliency" from the market, stating: “When I don’t see enough worry, then I start worrying. I’m happy now that more people are worrying about more things. I always say the strongest bull markets climb a wall of worry.”

Continuing speaking about her firm's due diligence on Tesla, she concluded (we swear we are not making this up): “As we’re updating our models, we’re being more optimistic on it."

“Nothing has changed in our models except to the upside.”



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/20/2020 6:04:23 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218009
 
this below is sad, now that I read it to the end

sloppy work by DD folks

Let's see what happens at Nikola

forbes.com

How A Cyber Fraud Company CEO Raised $123 Million In Months — And Got Arrested For Fraud
David Jeans08:42am EDT

Enterprise Tech
I cover tech companies for Forbes.

Adam Rogas was cornered. Until that hot Las Vegas afternoon on September 1, he was the only person at his company NS8 with access to one of the company’s two bank accounts where all the customer revenue was sent. But, in the preceding weeks, executives at the cyber fraud software startup had begun asking questions about how much money it actually had.

Following pressure to show those bank statements, he agreed to meet NS8’s vice president of finance at a Bank of America branch on Charleston Boulevard, where he would hand over the account’s login credentials, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

But minutes before the scheduled meeting time, NS8’s board received an email from Rogas, announcing his resignation as CEO. Effective immediately.

NS8 is now in the process of winding down after laying off most of its 200-plus employees last week. Some of its blue chip investors, who poured in more than $150 million, have informed their partners that there may be little or no financial recovery.

For those left wondering what happened at one of Las Vegas’ hottest tech startups — and one of its most bizarre alleged frauds — some questions were answered on Thursday when Rogas was arrested by the FBI in Las Vegas. The 43-year-old was charged with multiple counts of fraud by the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, alleging that he fabricated bank statements and misled investors for years. He is facing penalties up to 20 years in prison, and is expected to appear in court Friday.

As recently as June, Rogas had allegedly shared falsified bank statements with employees and investors that showed the company’s BOA account had $62 million. According to the SEC complaint, the actual figure was closer to $28,000. Such deceit enabled Rogas to pocket more than $17.5 million selling his shares to investors in April, the SEC claims.

In communications with Forbes prior to his arrest, Rogas said that investors had pushed to buy more shares in the company after it almost ran out of money in September 2019. He went on to say that he had left the company for personal and family reasons. “I just couldn’t do it anymore and knew I didn’t have what it would take to go back to my board and other investors to raise more funds to keep the company going and moving forward,” he wrote to Forbes via LinkedIn.

In a statement, NS8 spokesperson Genevieve Haldeman said that the federal investigation is ongoing, though no one else has been charged. Upon an internal probe, she said, the board had learned “much of the company’s revenue and customer information had been fabricated by Mr. Rogas.”

But some of NS8’s departed employees told Forbes they had been raising flags to NS8 executives about major discrepancies in its financial figures for some time. “I’ve said for a while now that NS8 is a Potemkin Village,” says Matt Zehner, a former sales director at NS8 who told executives in June he believed the company could be involved in fraud.

Beyond Rogas’ actions, questions remain about how high-profile investors — including Lightspeed Venture Partners, Sorenson Capital Partners and AXA Venture Partners — could have missed signs that NS8 was allegedly committing fraud as they poured in millions of dollars.

“The bottom line is some of us were probably lied to.”

Tiffany Kleemann, NS8 interim CEOThat point has been further highlighted after the SEC disclosed this week that it had been investigating NS8 since December 2019, four months before the company received $73 million in an April funding round led by Lightspeed to buy existing shares, including the $17.5 million paid to Rogas.

Neither AXA or Lightspeed would respond to questions about whether they knew that NS8 was under investigation at the time of their recent investment, nor would they discuss what due diligence was done. Sorenson Capital did not respond to requests for comment.

Lightspeed said in a statement that it “believes that we and other investors were deceived in the due diligence process by the company and were defrauded of millions of dollars.”

For NS8’s former employees, who now find themselves without a job in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, the investors' oversight is baffling. “Lightspeed Ventures, they’re rich as hell — for them, this is a drop in a bucket,” says Zehner, the former employee. “But you would still think they’d have done better due diligence. I guarantee you someone’s head should be rolling there.”

Before NS8, Rogas had a seemingly solid track record. He held executive roles at a medical marketing company and a website hosting firm, and in 2012 launched a Las Vegas-based company called Catch5 that claimed to prevent advertising fraud. While Catch5 didn’t take off, it served as a launching pad for NS8, which he co-founded in 2016.

He was seen as a talented coder at NS8, and until recently, was well-liked. “I always enjoyed working with him,” says one senior employee who reported to Rogas on a weekly basis. “If he was a super smart guy but not nice to a person, or a strange guy, I’d be like ‘yeah, makes sense.’” The employee adds: “It feels like the perfect con.”

Rogas’ happy-go-lucky persona wooed investors, too. In 2017, NS8 landed $7.5 million in a seed funding round led by Arbor Ventures. The product was a software tool for small and medium businesses that claimed to use data analytics to detect fraud in e-commerce transactions. Part of the key to NS8’s purported success relied on partnership programs it had with major e-commerce platforms such as Shopify and Magento, which would recommend NS8’s product to their own merchants.

But from an early stage, Rogas was allegedly reporting false financial statements to investors. His ability to conceal the alleged fraud hinged on the fact that he had sole access to NS8’s account with Bank of America where the company sent customer payments and revenue; the company didn’t employ a chief financial officer. (A separate account with Silicon Valley Bank, used for operations and where investor money was deposited, was accessed by multiple people.)

Starting in at least January 2018, Rogas allegedly doctored the Bank of America statements to show revenue figures that were grossly inflated. In September 2019, the same month that NS8 raised $50 million, its false bank statements showed $23.7 million. According to the SEC, the real number was $5,636.

By the end of 2019, authorities were investigating NS8. The company, Rogas and two other executives received subpoenas from the SEC in December requesting information related to claims that investors had been misled — a probe the company believed had been triggered by a whistleblower complaint, according to internal documents.

The timing couldn’t have been worse. Rogas was in talks to raise another major funding round led by Lightspeed Venture Partners — a deal in which he could sell millions of dollars worth of shares back to investors. Before handing over the capital, Lightspeed hired the accounting firm EY to conduct due diligence, people with direct knowledge of the funding round tell Forbes.

Despite pressure from the SEC probe — the agency issued another round of subpoenas in March — and a massive windfall on the horizon, Rogas allegedly continued to doctor NS8’s bank statements. When a consultant working on behalf of an investor found discrepancies in NS8’s bank statement in March, according to the SEC, Rogas allegedly fixed the statement to include a false deposit of $1 million, shoring up the balance.

“It’s really, really hard for me to believe that no one knew what was happening.”

Brandon Storms, former NS8 employeeAround the same time, employees — kept in the dark about the SEC probe — were asking questions. In a memo sent to multiple executives at the start of June, Zehner, the former sales director, used SalesForce data to show that almost 70% of NS8’s “partners” — companies which supposedly directed customers to NS8 — had never communicated with NS8.

“If I was able to uncover this evidence in a rudimentary audit, imagine what a potential acquisition partner would uncover!” Zehner wrote. “I'm initially inclined to assume that we're victims of an elaborate fraud scheme.”

Zehner says he never received any feedback; NS8 didn’t respond. But eight days after he sent the memo, NS8 announced its closing of a $123 million funding round led by Lightspeed — a deal that allowed Rogas to pocket $17.5 million by selling shares.

EY, whose chairman recently called for auditors to play a greater role in detecting fraud after the firm was embroiled in a massive scandal at German payments startup Wirecard, where $2 billion went missing, declined to comment on its due diligence of NS8 because “it is a client matter.”

NS8’s remaining executives, meanwhile, are trying to deal with the fallout. A week after Rogas failed to show at the Las Vegas bank and resigned, NS8’s new CEO Tiffany Kleemann appeared on a Zoom call to deliver the news to employees that they were being laid off without severance.

Breaking down in tears, Kleemann told employees that she, along with them, had been deceived by Rogas. “I came into this company having been told a number of things by Adam,” Kleemann said, according to a recording obtained by Forbes. “The bottom line is some of us were probably lied to.”

Kleemann, who joined NS8 in June as president, went on to say that the SEC investigation was ongoing. “We can agree at least,” she said, “that if there was any wrongdoing, that individual, or those individuals, are held accountable.”

Brandon Storms, a former NS8 business development manager tells Forbes that he hasn’t been able to sleep since losing his job. He adds: “It’s really, really hard for me to believe that no one knew what was happening.”



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)9/20/2020 8:04:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218009
 
:0) something about Battery Day from Seeking Alpha & Yahoo that might make Gamma for me this week, so that I might be able to engage w/ quite a lot of Au before end-November unless I decide to reinvest in Elon, he who can fart perfume along w/ hot air, but cool hot air

am agnostic w/ positive bias w/r to Battery Day (North America Tuesday) and Battery Week, and know that anything can happen, up or / and down, or down or / and up. Doesn't matter as long as below 700 on 20th November. And certainly better < 800 on 20th November.

In any and all cases, all hands on keyboard, battle stations, DEFCON 5 and likely to DEFCON 1 by start of trading day 22nd September.

(1) seekingalpha.com
Battery teardown time: Tesla ( TSLA) holds its annual shareholder meeting on September 22 to be immediately followed by the highly-anticipated Battery Day event. Expectations are that Tesla will reveal plans to ramp up battery capacity, show off improved cell chemistry/performance and highlight how the cost curve could spiral downward. Wedbush Securities expects a home run from Elon Musk and gang. "We believe the company is getting closer to announcing the million mile battery at this highly-anticipated event. In our opinion this battery technology will be very advanced, potentially last for decades, withstand all types of weather/terrain, and be another major milestone for the Tesla ecosystem," writes analyst Dan Ives. Panasonic ( OTCPK:PCRFY) will be on edge to see if Tesla tips off a goal to become battery independent over time. Other stocks to watch around the event include the usual EV auto suspects like Nio (NYSE: NIO), Li Auto (NASDAQ: LI), Xpeng (NYSE: XPEV) and Kandi Technologies (NASDAQ: KNDI). There is also Glencore ( OTCPK:GLCNF, OTCPK:GLNCY) to keep tabs on just in case Tesla pulls out a wildcard with its cobalt plans. Strap in for some fun.

(2) finance.yahoo.com
Tesla Battery DayOn Tuesday, Tesla ( TSLA) will host its highly anticipated, inaugural company event focused on unveiling new battery technology.

CEO Elon Musk has teased the event in recent Twitter posts, saying on Sept. 11 that “many exciting things” will be revealed for the first time at the event.

Questions around battery efficiency, costs, sizing, durability and range will likely take center stage, as investors and potential buyers look for the technology to far surpass capabilities provided by combustion engines, and provide an incentive for customers to pivot toward battery electric vehicles.

Wall Street analysts have largely been constructive on Tesla heading into the event. Piper Sandler late last week raised Tesla’s price target to $515 from $480 and reiterated its Overweight rating, citing the expanded opportunity in Tesla’s energy business unit.

In a similar vein, analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush raised his price target on Tesla to $475 from $380 and reiterated his Neutral rating, calling Battery Day a likely “linchpin” event for the auto-maker.

“We believe Musk & Co. are slated to announce a number of new potential ‘game changing’ battery developments at this event which has become incrementally more important as competition in the EV space continues to ramp both domestically and internationally,” Ives wrote in a note Friday. “The technology innovations around Giga/Fremont remain the key ingredients in Tesla's success on the battery front and we believe the company is getting closer to announcing the million mile battery at this highly anticipated event.”

“In our opinion this battery technology will be very advanced, potentially last for decades, withstand all types of weather/terrain, and be another major milestone for the Tesla ecosystem,” he added. “In theory this battery will support an electric vehicle for 1 million miles and be a major step forward when competing vs. traditional gasoline powered automotive competitors from both an ROI and environmental perspective. Another linchpin to Tesla's battery innovations and the Street's focus of the upcoming Battery Day will be reducing battery production costs on a trajectory to the key $100/kWh threshold as this would give Tesla much more financial flexibility around pricing on current and future EV models with price parity.”



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)10/11/2020 3:58:34 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218009
 
<<Kim the Fatter>>

Looking at the N Korea situation from a few angles this day made me ponder, that should Kim go straight, there ought to be far more potential to diligent N Koreans than making bombs and delivery constructs

They seem quite adaptive and persistent

bloomberg.com

How Kim Jong Un Keeps Advancing North Korea’s Nuclear Program
Jon Herskovitz13 December 2019, 08:15 GMT+8



Kim Jong Un at a ribbon-cutting ceremony in Samjiyon County, on Dec. 2. Photographer: KCNA/Handout/Xinhua via Getty ImagesAfter an unprecedented series of meetings between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un since June 2018, negotiations over eliminating the latter’s nuclear arsenal have stalled. In the meantime, Kim has been busy making his nuclear arsenal bigger, deadlier and better able to strike South Korea, Japan, American forces stationed in Asia -- and the U.S. mainland. At an October military parade to mark the 75th anniversary of the ruling Workers’ Party, Kim unveiled a new array of weaponry that shows how far his arsenal has grown in the last two years, and included a recently developed missile designed to strike the U.S. The achievements undermine Trump’s assertion that his summits with Kim in 2018 and 2019 had ensured North Korea was “no longer a nuclear threat.”



People celebrate the 75th anniversary of the ruling Workers’ Party during a parade at the Kim Il Sung Square in Pyongyang, Oct. 10.

Source: Korean Central News Agency/Korea News Service via AP Photo

1. Could Kim really hit the U.S.?Kim appears to have acquired that capability after successfully testing an intercontinental ballistic missile in Nov. 2017. But one test may not be enough to ensure the reliability of the ICBM known as the Hwasong-15. The new ICBM displayed at the October military parade, is bigger and likely boasts more powerful engines, weapons experts said. They added that its likely purpose is to deliver a multiple nuclear warhead payload that could overwhelm U.S. defenses, or a high-yield weapon. North Korea can fit miniature warheads onto missiles and shoot them, a United Nations report this year said. It has also developed weapons that can be moved around more swiftly to evade detection. What’s less clear is whether Kim’s military could beat antimissile systems and survive reentry, or if its weapons are refined enough to strike their intended targets.



Kim Jong Un at a ribbon-cutting ceremony in Samjiyon County, on Dec. 2.

Photographer: KCNA/Handout/Xinhua via Getty Images

2. What about its bombs?Of North Korea’s six atomic tests, Kim was responsible for four. They’ve come a long way since the first detonation in 2006 which measured less than one kiloton, leaving experts wondering whether it had been a partial failure. (A kiloton is equal to the force of 1,000 tons of TNT). The most recent, in September 2017, was the most powerful. Its estimated yield of 120-250 kilotons dwarfed the 15-20 kiloton U.S. bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Experts estimate that North Korea has assembled 30-40 nuclear warheads, the fewest among the nine nations with nuclear weapons.

3. How are North Korea’s weapons more nimble?Kim has rolled out new solid-fuel ballistic missiles that are easier to move, hide and fire than many liquid-fuel versions. He has launched more than two dozen since May 2019 including nuclear-capable, hypersonic KN-23 missiles that can strike all of South Korea -- including U.S. forces stationed south of Seoul -- within two minutes. He has also launched KN-25 short-range missiles designed to be fired in rapid succession from a single launcher to overwhelm interceptors. The new ballistic Pukguksong-3 missile -- the biggest of the bunch -- is designed to be fired from a submarine and has an estimated range of 1,900 kilometers (1,200 miles). At the parade in October, it rolled out an even more advanced version, which likely has a greater range and payload capacity. Weapons experts say North Korea is also developing an ICBM that uses solid-propellant technology, potentially giving the U.S. less warning ahead of any strike aimed at the mainland.

Return of Rocket Man
Missile tests under Kim Jong Un
Sources: South Korea Ministry of Defense and Center for Nonproliferation Studies

4. Where does Kim’s military get its fissile material?It has been self-sufficient for decades. The program, which once turned out enough plutonium for one nuclear bomb a year, now relies largely on uranium enrichment and, according to weapons experts, produces enough fissile material annually for about six bombs. The Trump administration says North Korea has enlarged its stockpile since nuclear talks began. Experts estimate the country as of 2018 had enough for roughly 30-60 nuclear weapons.



Yongbyon nuclear facility, Sept. 2019.

Source: Maxar/38 North via Getty Images

5. What other surprises might be out there?North Korea may be working on ICBMs that carry multiple warheads and in-flight countermeasures to throw interceptors off the trail, according to Datayo, an open-source weapons research site. Kim has pushed to develop his fleet of submarines and is looking to deploy a new vessel soon that experts say could fire missiles. He may even try to revive the country’s satellite program, arguing that North Korea has the right as a sovereign state to develop a space program. Weapons experts say satellite launches could be used by North Korea to advance missile technology.

6. How big are North Korea’s conventional forces?Despite being among the world’s poorest countries, North Korea has one of the largest militaries. Of its 25 million population, nearly 1.2 million people are in active service, according to a U.S. State Department report. On top of that, more than 6 million North Koreans are considered reserve soldiers. The military has thousands of pieces of artillery trained on the Seoul area and hundreds of missiles that can strike South Korea and Japan.

7. How can the country afford all this?The money needed is not huge in global terms. North Korea spent nearly $4 billion on its military in 2016, according to the State Department report -- roughly equivalent to two days’ U.S. military spending. As a share of its economy, though, the outlay ranks among the highest globally, if not the most. Although international sanctions have hit the economy hard, North Korea is evading some through means such as clandestine, high-seas transfers of banned goods such as oil, and generating enough cash to keep its nuclear program moving through methods that include ransomware attacks.



Test firing of an unspecified missile at an undisclosed location in North Korea.

Source: Korean Central News Agency/Korea News Service via AP Photo

8. Wasn’t Trump going to fix this?Trump’s talks with Kim, beginning with a much-heralded meeting in Singapore in June 2018, turned the duo from insult-throwing enemies into dialogue partners. Trump says his diplomacy with Pyongyang prevented a war. But their three meetings have yet to produce a significant breakthrough -- and the North Korean missile testing and name-calling have resumed. North Korea has become what three decades of diplomacy had tried to prevent -- a state capable of developing, projecting and detonating atomic bombs. The U.S. military is maintaining its customary “ high levels of readiness” on the Korean Peninsula as a deterrent to any threat, General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in December. Six months later, North Korea cut off communication links set up in 2018 with South Korea and blew up the inter-Korean liaison office.

The Reference ShelfA Bloomberg infographic considers the range of the missile threat.A QuickTake on who North Korea’s next leader might be, and on the Trump-Kim talks.“A heedless and erratic old man” -- the North Korean mud-slinging resumes.Who has nukes? The Arms Control Association explains.— With assistance by Jeong-Ho Lee

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (162652)10/11/2020 4:11:01 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218009
 
Bolton seems to advocate turning China into a N Korea

The prank might work, or not

Tactics it is not, and never mind strategy

Doubtful Bolton knows a strategy when one hits him

No wonder the Trump fired him Apprentice style

wsj.com

China Needs to Answer for Its North Korea Policy

Beijing has long avoided paying any kind of price for its acquiescence to the Kim regime’s games.

By
Sept. 29, 2020 6:29 pm ET


North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un is broadcast in Seoul, Sept. 25.Photo: jung yeon-je/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
For weeks, North Korea observers have speculated that Pyongyang was preparing an election surprise for the U.S., perhaps testing a submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missile. So far there’s been no launch, but the strange shooting death this weekend of a South Korean official who might have been looking to enter the North by boat nonetheless highlights the hair trigger on which the Peninsula still rests.

While Donald Trump has pursued the bright lights and glitter of international “summits” with Kim Jong Un, Pyongyang has relentlessly improved and expanded its nuclear and ballistic-missile capabilities. After almost four years of U.S. showmanship—but insufficient, inconsistent economic and political pressure—it is clear as Nov. 3 approaches that North Korea has again outperformed an American administration. A fourth Trump-Kim encounter might still emerge as an “October surprise” to aid Mr. Trump’s flagging re-election campaign, but participating in such a circus would be an act of self-abasement for the president.

Keeping the world guessing about his intentions has allowed Mr. Kim to divert attention from conditions in the North. “We’re not seeing any sign of regime instability,” said Gen. Robert Abrams, commander of U.S. Forces Korea, on Sept. 10. But little is known about how North Korea has been affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Pyongyang claims to have successfully sealed off its long border with China, but for all anyone knows North Korea’s primitive medical system is on the verge of collapse.

For decades Washington has accepted Beijing’s claim that it opposes Pyongyang’s ambitions because a nuclear North Korea would destabilize the region and impede China’s economic development. Successive American administrations accepted China as a middleman in negotiations. When North Korea repeatedly broke its commitments to renounce nuclear weapons, China helped enforce economic sanctions.

Opinion: Morning Editorial Report

All the day's Opinion headlines.

Those days are gone. China should no longer be treated as part of the solution on the Korean Peninsula. Beijing is—and likely always was—part of the problem. Rather than helping to denuclearize North Korea, Beijing has been content to let the U.S. and Japan focus on that threat as a distraction from China’s own growing menace. It’s clear now that Beijing sees a nuclear-capable Pyongyang as a “wild card” useful for keeping the West off balance.

Whether in a second Trump term or a Biden administration, simply pursuing variations on existing policy themes is almost certain to fail. Instead, the U.S. should make China’s continuing acquiescence to Mr. Kim’s nuclear and ballistic-missile programs a priority of the bilateral agenda. Biological and chemical weapons must also be included, since another unfortunate consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic is the proof it offers of the novel coronavirus’s potential as a weapon. Not without reason have these threats long been called “the poor man’s nuke.”

Other countries should take the same approach, as well as deepen their mutual politico-military cooperation. Not that India, Japan or Australia needs much encouragement. Tokyo’s increased willingness to invest in its military stems from its fear of China, not North Korea.

Beijing’s economic lifeline keeps the Kim dynasty in power. China should pay a price for its acquiescence. Additional economic sanctions aren’t enough. It’s time to revive the Cold War concept of linkage and make North Korea an issue for negotiations across the board in Washington’s bilateral relations with Beijing. China has been employing a “whole of government” approach to international affairs, and so should the U.S., raising Pyongyang’s nuclear threats along with existing issues like trade, theft of intellectual property, industrial espionage, forced technology transfer, spying, territorial claims, arms control and military expansion. A linkage policy will require broad international support, and it won’t happen through the United Nations, where China’s Security Council veto would stop the most important measures.

North Korea hasn’t pursued nuclear weapons in a vacuum. China knows it, and it needs to understand that the U.S. knows it too.

Mr. Bolton is author of “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir.” He served as the president’s national security adviser, 2018-19 and ambassador to the U.N., 2005-06.

WSJ Opinion: Hits and Misses of the Week

0:00 / 1:38
0:19

WSJ Opinion: Hits and Misses of the Week

Journal Editorial Report: The week's best and worst from Kim Strassel, Kyle Peterson and Dan Henninger. Images: Reuters/AFP/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly