Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (6445)	9/19/2020 8:14:44 PM
From: E_K_S	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13881

I believe there were 100 items that challenged many of the climate change arguments. I am not saying they are all true but Nobel Prize Scientist do ( I believe their arguments before an astrophysicist but they may agree on some points). Again it's not an all or none argument but rather a much more complected set of facts and observations. I set forth one solution using micro-grids that use AI smart grid technology based on next generation NG fuel cells as a transition (perhaps over next 50 years). That's the debate I think can provide a solution rather than the non sense you and other climate change people spew. Let's discuss solutions that make economic sense. I am an investor and that is the group that will spear head innovation IMO. Cities/Counties and even State must develop Mater Plans around the emerging technologies that work and then build the infrastructure to support that. "Come on, Man!" get with it and think and propose a solution that works. California's solution sure doesn't. EKS