Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (163197)	9/30/2020 5:31:17 PM
From: stuffbug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218353

Geesh, the hidin with Biden comment was a JOKE. Hidin Biden, sort of rhymes doesn't it. For you, Kamala is hope - for me, no hope. There are principled Democrats but Harris isn't one of them. I see no substantive rebuttal on the Kamala presidential run - Tulsi Gabbard ate her for breakfast during the debates. No Koolaid in my house - OJ, milk, wine and beer - but maybe in Kamala's. In her questioning of a Trump judicial nominee, she suggested that membership in the Knights of Columbus could be a disqualification for the position. So much for the constitution. Questions on judicial philosophy are valid and should definitely be asked, questions on religious practice and affiliations is a nogo zone. A topic for another day - Harris is an opportunist and is likely expecting to be President if Joe wins (25th amendment). Not so sure about that; starting to see some discussion that it would be the equivalent of a 3rd Obama term, with Kamala on the outside looking in (she wasn't part of the Obama wing of the Dems; if she was, O would have backed her run). There will be plenty more speculation of the mechanics of a Biden presidency if the poll numbers remain in his favour. As noted, for another day, but something to watch.