Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandytoes who wrote (11583)	1/29/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Kenneth R. Moss	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 79270

I still say that the best method to get rid of people like Blazer, Christopher Schmidt, and the Butcher man is to use the NEXT method. If nobody answers them, then they will go away. If you hit "next" then you can't answer them. Regards, Ken

To: sandytoes who wrote (11583)	1/29/1998 9:03:00 PM
From: Hank	Respond to of 79270

To All: Perhaps we should all petition SI to add a disclaimer to their log on page that states the folowing: "Neither the information posted here nor the individuals posting it are confirmed to be legitimate by SI. Following any investment advice contained within this web site without first consulting the facts could prove detrimental to your financial health" In todays world, we have been told time and time again that we are not responsible for using our own god given brains to make intelligent decisions and, hence, are not responsible for our actions when we screw up. Therefore, we must continually suffer through the "vigilante" efforts of people like Jeff so that we might not fall victim to ourselves. I don't follow the tips posted here but merely track them with interest. However, if I should ever be so foolish as to buy stocks just because Doug or anyone else here says so, I hope Jeff or some other knight in shining armor will save me! What a relief. Now I can sleep tonight. Hank

To: sandytoes who wrote (11583)	1/30/1998 9:55:00 AM
From: Dave H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79270

Thanks Sandy, It was really nice to read what you wrote. I hope our thread can get back to the group of people who have constructive stuff to say, without these infiltrators who seem to have some sort of agenda to tear people down and insult them. I don't care if lazer thinks the IL or ACT or PGDCEB don't exist; fine! but they are constructs that Doug has spent years researching and as we know who are regulars on this thread, they DO work and they DO exist. I welcome all differences of opinion concerning stock analysis but not the personal attacks and insults that lazer and his gang have been dumping on us these past weeks. thanks again sandy, dave

To: sandytoes who wrote (11583)	1/30/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: shasta23	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 79270

HI SANDY! Don't know anything about ACT and all the other acronyms but want to learn since i'm interested in TA. Did a full text search for ACT which didn't bring up a good post that explains anything. Do you know about past posts where the different concepts are a little bit explained. Any hint would be helpful. Thanks... Stefan

To: sandytoes who wrote (11583)	1/31/1998 7:46:00 AM
From: Greg Butcher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 79270

RE:"... if you really feel that way, write Doug a letter, but don't even begin to pretend to yourself that your words are going to raise the 'confused and mislead' masses up and away from the 56 threads. " I think what Lazar is trying to do here is save a lot of folks ALOT of money.. I once saw a post that Doug made that came right out at told people to buy 5000 shares of a un-proven co. This to me was extremely irresponsible on Dougs part. There are; from what I have heard,.. older folks who follow Dougs picks. And with his "hit and miss" gun slinger trading style....that could end up in disaster to someone who can not afford it. And IF the, as you put it "confused and mislead" don't wake up...they will also end up broke. young & old alike.