Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Manhattan Scientific....MHTX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spyder who wrote (21)	1/29/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: Gerald Thomas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 942

THE ASTOUNDING COMPARISON CONVENTIONAL CELLULAR PHONE BATTERIES AND THE ERD MICRO FUEL CELL Battery Micro Fuel Cell Comparison With Methanol And Small Battery Energy per Unit 1.35 Watt 73.5 Watt hours 54 times more hours energy: similar weight and volume. energizing time 90% refuel in less fueling for in 90 min. than 1 minute faster operation 100% in 15 hours and immediate recovery energy source 110 ac or 1.5 fluid ounces no constraints car charger of being near power grid or energy source to energize product lifetime 2 years 20 years 10 times longer.fuel cell life equal to that of cell phone talk time 2.25 hours 180 hours 44 times longer refueling gives practically unlimited talk time. standby time less than 2 days 41 days 34 times longer fuel and forget the fuel cell phone typical operational .5 days or less 23 days 46 times longer period conventional batteries limit usage production cost 7$ 37$ (prototype) 7$ mass production similar cost retail price 100$ 100$ similar cost