SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 2:00:44 PM
From: Wharf Rat2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1576925
 
Rat calls them deep-staters.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 2:11:49 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576925
 
BOMBSHELL: Amy Coney Barrett lived in home of secretive Christian group's co-founder
theguardian.com
Details of link to Kevin Ranaghan raise fresh questions about supreme court nominee’s involvement with People of Praise
Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington
Tue 6 Oct 2020 11.41 EDTLast modified on Tue 6 Oct 2020 16.21 EDT
Public records show Barrett, 48, lived in a nine-bedroom South Bend home owned at the time by religious scholar Kevin Ranaghan.

Amy Coney Barrett lived in the home of one of the founders of the People of Praise while she was a law student, raising new questions about the supreme court nominee’s involvement with the secretive Christian faith group that has been criticized for dominating the lives of its members and subjugating women.


Public records examined by the Guardian show that Barrett, a conservative 48-year-old appeals court judge who has been put up to fill the vacant seat left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, lived in a nine-bedroom South Bend, Indiana, residence owned at the time by Kevin Ranaghan, a religious scholar and a co-founder of Barrett’s faith group, during law school.

The revelation offers new clues about the possible influence of the People of Praise, and one of its leaders, on a woman who may shape the direction of the supreme court for the next 40 to 50 years. Barrett has said she is a “faithful Catholic” but that her religious beliefs would not “bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge”.

Public records – and a record of a speeding ticket – show that Barrett’s husband, Jesse, apparently also lived in the home in the years before their 1999 marriage. The public records examined by the Guardian show where individuals receive their mail, including bills. It is difficult, based on the records alone, to determine when precisely individuals lived in the residence. The database shows no other residence for Amy Barrett at that time.

Amy Barrett, who as Amy Coney graduated from Notre Dame Law in 1997 at the top of her class, has said she met Jesse while she was in law school but has not offered other details. Records show that other individuals who appear to be members of the People of Praise have also gotten married following periods of living in the Ranaghan household.

Insider accounts by former members who are now critical of the organization suggest that the group has “well-developed courtship and marriage traditions” which are closely followed. One critic, former member Adrian Reimers, has said in writings about his experience that people who are in the community do not usually date until the matter has been prayed upon by an individual’s “head” – or spiritual leader – who helps make decisions about whether a couple ought to get married.

Reached by phone by the Guardian, Dorothy Ranaghan, who is married to Kevin Ranaghan, confirmed that Amy Barrett had previously lived in their home. Asked to describe the experience, she said: “Let’s just say it was one of the better experiences of our life. She is just a gem. But I don’t feel comfortable talking right now.”

Asked whether she could confirm that she and her husband took in students for many years she said: “I just prefer not to talk about it, but yes, many years.”

Let’s just say it was one of the better experiences of our life. She is just a gem

Dorothy RanaghanShe then directed the Guardian to call Sean Connolly, a spokesman for People of Praise. Connolly said it would be “inappropriate” to comment. The White House declined to comment.

There are only a few details about Barrett’s history with the People of Praise. While Barrett has identified herself as a Catholic, and belongs to a conservative parish in Indiana, People of Praise is an ecumenical group that – some literature shows – sees itself as distinct from other Christian groups in that its members have entered a covenant – or a vow – to support each other “financially and materially and spiritually”.

People of Praise has, according to reporting by the Associated Press, “erased numerous records from its website during the summer of 2017 when she was nominated as an appeals court judge that referred to Barrett and included photos of her and her family.”

While Barrett has never spoken publicly about her membership in the group since becoming a public figure in 2017, her picture appeared in an internal magazine in 2006 that is still available, and she has served as a trustee at a school affiliated with the faith group that is opposed to gay marriage and espouses other conservative values. Her family are also known members, with her father playing a leadership role in her native Louisiana.

The group has been criticized by some former members for adhering to a strict authoritarian structure, including the expectation that women are subordinate to their husbands, who are considered their “heads”. The notion marks a contrast to what is known about Barrett’s own life. While she is the mother of seven – including two children the Barretts adopted from Haiti – Barrett has publicly praised her husband for taking a lead in the household. When she accepted Donald Trump’s nomination, Barrett thanked her husband and commented that her children believed he was the better cook of the two.

Among other practices, like speaking in tongues, members of the People of Praise are expected to donate 5% of their earnings to the group and can be required to house other members. Previous magazines that are still available show that the group staunchly supports “traditional marriage” and is opposed to same-sex marriage.

In a special Vine & Branch internal magazine devoted to marriage in 2014, it states that: “Governments do have good reason to support and encourage this kind of [heterosexual] marriage because they have a vested interest in producing future generations of well-informed citizens. Supporting traditional marriage is a time-honored way for societies to ensure that children are well cared for.”

The Guardian could not reach Kevin Ranaghan at his home.

In a book that describes the early founding of the People of Praise, Reimers, the former member turned critic said that Ranaghan “likened the covenant of the People of Praise to the marriage vow”, suggesting a similar obligation.

Reimer wrote: “The covenant of the People of Praise is – according to Ranaghan – an objectively binding obligation in conscience, one that cannot be abandoned without the agreement of the other parties involved. If so many people should decide at one time to leave, then the most logical explanation is that evil spirits have inspired them to do so.”

He added that members of People of Praise believe the covenant relationship to be “more important than any relationship with any other person”. Reimer also described in his writing what he believed to be an important aspect of People of Praise life: strict adherence to “obedience” as a way to root out sin and “grow in holiness”.

Current members have anonymously defended the group in other press reports, telling the AP that it has been misunderstood and that it is simply a Christian fellowship focused on building community. One member described it to the AP as a “family of families” who commit themselves to each other in mutual support to live together “through thick and thin”.

Democrats on the Senate judiciary committee have emphatically stated that Barrett’s faith was not an issue that would be raised in upcoming confirmation hearings. Pressed on the issue recently by the Guardian, the Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal, a member of the committee, said he had “no intention” of questioning Barrett about her “religious faith or religious affiliation”.

“I think the arguments against her are so powerful and persuasive on the merits, that we should focus on them,” he said.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 2:14:23 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576925
 
GOP PANICS: McConnell hits out at Guardian and other media over Amy Coney Barrett scrutiny
Senate majority leader says reports of Barrett’s background in a Christian faith group ‘insult millions of American believers’
Martin Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Wed 7 Oct 2020 12.19 EDT
theguardian.com

Top Republican Mitch McConnell lashed out on Wednesday at reports about Amy Coney Barrett’s background in a strict religious group which the Senate majority leader claimed “demean the [supreme court] confirmation process, disrespect the constitution and insult millions of American believers”.


Revealed: Amy Coney Barrett lived in home of secretive Christian group's co-founder

Among McConnell’s targets was a Guardian report which said Barrett “lived in the home of one of the founders of the People of Praise while she was a law student, raising new questions about the supreme court nominee’s involvement with the secretive Christian faith group that has been criticized for dominating the lives of its members and subjugating women”.

Barrett is an Indiana-based appeals court judge whose strict Catholic views are the subject of concern among progressives, particularly over the fate of Roe v Wade, the 1973 supreme court ruling which made abortion legal across the US.

People of Praise, a charismatic religious group, was recently revealed to have scrubbed its website of mentions of Barrett.

McConnell wants to confirm Barrett as a replacement for the late justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the presidential election on 3 November, tilting the court 6-3 in favour of conservatives as key decisions loom on healthcare, abortion, gay rights and more.

Democrats have little power to stop the process, even with Republican members of the Senate judiciary committee infected with the coronavirus, potentially as a result of attending Barrett’s introduction at the White House on Saturday 26 September.

The Guardian was not the only outlet to publish a story about Barrett on Tuesday. Citing records which People of Praise has taken off its website, the Washington Post said: “A 2010 directory states that she held the title of ‘handmaid’, a leadership position for women in the community”.

Other outlets have erroneously reported that People of Praise was an inspiration for The Handmaid’s Tale, the Canadian author Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel which depicts a society in which women are property of the state, and which was adapted for a hit TV series.

“The word ‘handmaid’ appears dozens of times in the King James Bible,” McConnell said. “It was good enough for the Virgin Mary. But now, because one liberal author put it in the title of an anti-religious novel in the 1980s, the press tries to imply that one of the most brilliant and powerful women in the legal world is anti-women.”

The Post quoted a former member of the group as saying a “handmaid” was a leadership position, though subordinate to male leadership in People of Praise.

As the Guardian reported in September, “Interviews with experts who have studied charismatic Christian groups such as People of Praise, and with former members of the group, plus a review of the group’s own literature, reveal an organization that appears to dominate some members’ everyday lives, in which so-called ‘heads’ – or spiritual advisers – make big life decisions, and in which members are expected to financially support one another.

“Married women – such as Barrett – count their husbands as their ‘heads’ and all members are expected to donate 5% of their income to the organization.”

Barrett has said she does not allow her religious beliefs to influence her decisions on constitutional law.

After voicing a key Republican talking point, comparing supposed progressive anti-Catholic bigotry to attacks on President John F Kennedy, a liberal hero, McConnell added: “Our coastal elites are so disconnected from their own country that they treat religious Americans like animals in a menagerie.”

Many Democrats contend McConnell is disconnected from public opinion when it comes to the question of whether the Barrett confirmation should be rammed through so close to the election, which polls show is an unpopular move.

McConnell has the votes to succeed, regardless of his and other senior Republicans’ statements in 2016, another election year, when they refused to even hold hearings for Merrick Garland, a moderate nominated by Barack Obama to replace the conservative Antonin Scalia.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 5:30:22 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
sylvester80

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576925
 
Against Trump's will, the Deep State saved MI from the LIBERATION Trump called his Nazi followers to join.

Trump publicly calls on the FBI and AG to arrest his political rivals but they won't do it.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 5:49:38 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
sylvester80

  Respond to of 1576925
 
Trump wants NV and NM govts to be overthrown too:

Aaron Rupar

Replying to @atrupar
"We have law enforcement watching him very strong. The US Attorney is watching [the gov of Nevada], very strongly. The US Marshal is watching. In New Mexico, a state I think we can win, we have the US Marshal and the US Attorney watching him"



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 5:56:07 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
sylvester80

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576925
 
Kyle Cheney

NEW: The FBI has unsealed details of an alleged plot by militia members to kidnap Gov. WHITMER — the conspirators had staked out her vacation home, obtained explosives and other equipment, preparing to execute it before the electon. https://static.politico.com/e5/1d/aa6277a242e0af889ec06f7e4a12/michiganaffidavit.pdf

PoliticalWaif

Something I did NOT know about that militia plot to kidnap Witmer... there were also seven arrested for wanting to kill police to incite a civil war... something the trump*head don't want to accept as a reality because it interferes with their "but but but ANTIFA!" meme.

This WaPo article shouldn't be behind a paywall..

The FBI revealed Thursday that it thwarted a plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, unsealing charges against six people who it said contemplated a violent overthrow of the government as state as state authorities charged seven more who they said wanted to attack police and ignite a civil war.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/michigan-governor-kidnap-plot/2020/10/08/0032e206-0980-11eb-9be6-cf25fb429f1a_story.html?utm_campaign=wp_to_your_health&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_tyh&wpmk=1&pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJjb29raWVuYW1lIjoid3BfY3J0aWQiLCJpc3MiOiJDYXJ0YSIsImNvb2tpZXZhbHVlIjoiNTk4NjY3N2Q5YmJjMGY2ODI2ZTg5MWI5IiwidGFnIjoiNWY3Zjc5MzY5ZDJmZGEwZWZiNDMzNGVkIiwidXJsIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cud2FzaGluZ3RvbnBvc3QuY29tL25hdGlvbmFsLXNlY3VyaXR5L21pY2hpZ2FuLWdvdmVybm9yLWtpZG5hcC1wbG90LzIwMjAvMTAvMDgvMDAzMmUyMDYtMDk4MC0xMWViLTliZTYtY2YyNWZiNDI5ZjFhX3N0b3J5Lmh0bWw_dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPXdwX3RvX3lvdXJfaGVhbHRoJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1uZXdzbGV0dGVyJndwaXNyYz1ubF90eWgmd3Btaz0xIn0.3RjsO11u6E3vegDTZkc8RopSVqWL5wmGyyF6oiuTkDI



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 5:58:17 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
sylvester80

  Respond to of 1576925
 
2soon2b4got10

Trump has long been vilifying Governor Whitmer, issuing rallying cries to violent men. These terrorists took him seriously. Fortunately, they were caught but that doesn’t change the fact that the POTUS was abetting terrorism.

Hopefully, the next administration we will see a concerted, all-hands-on-deck effort by the Justice Department and the FBI to address white supremacist militias and other terrorist groups. For too long, they have been shielded by Low-Barr and Trump.

One of the many paradoxes of the Trump era: people who call themselves "patriots" are actually engaging in treasonous acts.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 6:09:08 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1576925
 
13 charged in plots against Michigan governor, police
By DAVID EGGERT and ED WHITEan hour ago



apnews.com of 4

FILE - In this March 5, 2020, file photo, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel speaks during a news conference in Lansing, Mich. Nessel has charged seven people with plotting to target law enforcement and attack state Capitol building. The announcement comes after six others were charged with plotting to kidnap Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer at her vacation home in reaction to what they viewed as her "uncontrolled power," according to a criminal complaint unsealed Thursday , Oct. 8, 2020, in federal court. (AP Photo/David Eggert, File)

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Agents foiled a stunning plot to kidnap Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, authorities said Thursday in announcing charges in an alleged scheme that involved months of planning and even rehearsals to snatch her from her vacation home.

Six men were charged in federal court with conspiring to kidnap the governor in reaction to what they viewed as her “uncontrolled power,” according to a federal complaint. Separately, seven others were charged in state court under Michigan’s anti-terrorism laws for allegedly targeting police and seeking a “civil war.”

A few hours later, Whitmer pinned some blame on President Donald Trump, noting that he did not condemn white supremacists in last week’s debate with Joe Biden and instead told a far-right group to “stand back and stand by.”

“Hate groups heard the president’s words not as a rebuke but as a rallying cry, as a call to action,” Whitmer said. “When our leaders speak, their words matter. They carry weight.”

The six men charged in federal court plotted for months, consulting and training with members of a group that federal authorities described as a militia, and undertaking rehearsals in August and September, according to an FBI affidavit. They were arrested Wednesday night and face up to life in prison if convicted.





Four had planned Wednesday to meet to “make a payment on explosives and exchange tactical gear,” the FBI said in the court filing.

The FBI quoted one of the accused as saying Whitmer “has no checks and balances at all. She has uncontrolled power right now. All good things must come to an end.”

Andrew Birge, the U.S. attorney in western Michigan, called the men “violent extremists.”

“All of us in Michigan can disagree about politics, but those disagreements should never, ever amount to violence. Violence has been prevented today,” Detroit U.S. Attorney Matthew Schneider told reporters.

Whitmer, who was considered as Joe Biden’s running mate, has been praised but also deeply criticized by the Republican-controlled Legislature and conservatives areas of the state for Michigan’s response to the coronavirus. She put major restrictions on personal movement throughout the state and on the economy, although many of those limits have been lifted. The governor has exchanged barbs with Trump on social media, with the president declaring in April, “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!”

He has referred to Whitmer as the “woman in Michigan.” There’s no indication in the criminal complaint that the men were inspired by Trump. Authorities also have not publicly said whether the men were angry about Whitmer’s coronavirus orders.

The Michigan Supreme Court last week ruled that a 1945 law used as the foundation for many of Whitmer’s orders was unconstitutional. The decision was 4-3, with justices who were nominated by Republicans in the majority.

The government said the plot against Whitmer was stopped with the work of undercover agents and informants.

Whitmer thanked law enforcement for thwarting the alleged conspirators and said she hopes that convictions will bring “these sick and depraved men to justice.”

Through electronic communications, two of the alleged conspirators “agreed to unite others in their cause and take violent action against multiple state governments that they believe are violating the U.S. Constitution,” the FBI said.

The criminal complaint identified the six as Adam Fox, Ty Garbin, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, Brandon Caserta, all of Michigan, and Barry Croft of Delaware. All but Croft appeared in federal court in Grand Rapids. They asked for court-appointed lawyers and were returned to jail to await detention hearings Tuesday.

Fox said he needed 200 men to storm the Capitol building in Lansing and take hostages, including the governor, according to the FBI. He said he wanted to try Whitmer for “treason” and would execute the plan before the Nov. 3 election, the government said. The group later shifted to targeting the governor’s vacation home, the FBI said.

The government said the scheme appeared to have roots in a June gathering in Dublin, Ohio, attended by more than a dozen people from several states, including Croft and Fox.

Full Coverage: Michigan
“The group talked about creating a society that followed the U.S. Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient,” the FBI affidavit said. “They discussed different ways of achieving this goal from peaceful endeavors to violent actions. ... Several members talked about murdering ‘tyrants’ or ‘taking’ a sitting governor.”

In a separate but related action, state authorities announced terrorism-related charges against seven men who were said to belong to or were associated with Wolverine Watchmen, which was described as a militia group.

The seven men are accused of identifying the homes of law enforcement officers and making violent threats “intended to instigate a civil war,” Attorney General Dana Nessel said.

They trained for an operation to attack the Michigan Capitol and to kidnap officials, including the governor, Nessel said.



To: Bill who wrote (1267528)10/8/2020 6:12:01 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1576925
 
Pence’s Red Eye Raises COVID Concerns
By Aaron Gould Sheinin

Pic from Drudge.

Oct. 8, 2020 -- Vice President Mike Pence’s left eye appeared red during Wednesday night’s vice presidential debate, leading internet users to guess that Pence has pinkeye -- a known symptom of COVID-19.

During the debate with Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris, Pence’s eye definitely appeared red. While the campaign and his office have not commented on his condition, it didn’t stop others from suggesting the vice president had pinkeye, officially known as conjunctivitis.

Together with a pesky fly that landed on Pence’s head, it made for provocative chatter.

“He had a bloody eye and a fly on his head,” Anderson Cooper said on CNN.

Pinkeye has long been known as a possible symptom of the coronavirus. The possibility that Pence has pinkeye is then more significant given the coronavirus outbreak now hitting the White House. President Donald Trump and many others have tested positive for the virus, and while Pence says he has thus far tested negative, experts said this week that the vice president should be in quarantine and not taking part in campaign events or Wednesday’s debate.

"Pink Eye often a symptom of COVID-19": Vice President Mike Pence's left eye sparked off a flurry of speculation on social media #VPDebate t.co pic.twitter.com/NhNskx3dJo

— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) October 8, 2020
Nearly a quarter of pediatric COVID patients had pinkeye from Jan. 26 through March 18, according to a study published in JAMA Ophthalmology on Aug. 26. A second study published in the same journal the next day detailed two adults with COVID and conjunctivitis. One was a 29-year-old male and the other a 51-year-old woman.

In June, researchers at the University of Alberta in Canada examined a case of a 29-year-old woman with COVID and conjunctivitis. Scientists there found that pinkeye is a secondary symptom of COVID in 10% to 15% of cases.

A study from China, published in late March, found 12 of 38 patients with COVID-19 also had pinkeye.

The more severe a patient's COVID-19 is, the more likely it is that they will also have pinkeye, according to the report published online March 31 in JAMA Ophthalmology.

Alfred Sommer, MD, a professor of epidemiology and international health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, wrote an editorial that accompanied the study.

"This is a warning to people that the conjunctiva can be a source of infection that might spread to others," he said.

webmd.com