SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Berk who wrote (163530)10/10/2020 9:27:10 AM
From: THE ANT2 Recommendations

Recommended By
elmatador
SirWalterRalegh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219648
 
In 1981 I read an editorial in the WSJ by a mathematician who explained why assets go up or down by 30% for every 1 point rise or fall in interest rates. I copied it and carried it with me for years. I lost the article and looked for it at the WSJ site but could not find it again. Barton Biggs had a figure in this range too. My observation over 30 years is that it is correct. I have a brain that simplifies all data to simple models. I have a book coming out in psychiatry that has models of mental illness that will pass on to the lay person in 190 pages 50% of learning I have done in 30 years in the field



To: Berk who wrote (163530)10/10/2020 10:23:40 AM
From: THE ANT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219648
 
The housing observation may have been from Steve Keens. The author was saying the US should change its lending for housing to the British style for the boom bust reason he gave


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News