SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rarebird who wrote (1268481)10/11/2020 11:54:47 AM
From: Real Man1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Maple MAGA

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583681
 
It’s a pointless argument. Yes, I think a woman can do it whatever she wants, except when it comes to another
life. A baby has a heartbeat at 20 weeks and some are born very early and can survive. I
don’t know when the baby inside a woman becomes another human, I just want to not decide such issues and stay on the safe side. One can choose to kill someone, but our society has legal consequences for such a choice. A child is not an extension of a woman’s body.



To: Rarebird who wrote (1268481)10/11/2020 12:21:36 PM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1583681
 
It is not for you to decide what a woman should do with the embryo inside her. You say you don't like law enforcement and child services. Well, you are abusing other people's rights too.


“Eugenics asserts that all men must be so stupid that they cannot manage their own affairs; and also so clever that they can manage each other's.” GKC