Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (455469)	10/18/2020 11:57:33 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542269

I stand corrected. I had read she was not qualified? I looked it up and the ABA said she was. Having said that, it is interesting that someone can be well qualified and not acceptable!? Maybe we need to change our criteria for what is qualified, like a psychological test :)>. Message #455469 from JohnM at 10/18/2020 11:36:44 AM What are you saying? Do you think she is qualified? I'll be happy to weigh in here. Of course, Barrett is qualified. Law school professor; 7th circuit judge; ABA approved. Strikes me as qualified. Is she acceptable? Good heavens. Not. She is clearly a part of the right wing judicial push to cancel the strong SC push through the 60s, 70s, and 80s to enact the constitutions equality provisions. And is clearly part of a self conscious push for minority rule. Embodded in the courts.