To: WWS who wrote (1343 ) 1/30/1998 12:11:00 AM From: Marshall Teitelbaum Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2205
Bill, Bruce, and all, off topic..Bill and Bruce...unfortunately have had a bunch of other things on my plate which weren't expected over the last week or so, so have had a lot of extra stress which has kept me away from much of the market stuff...maybe a blessing in disguise from that end this week, but I'd rather have simply been a bit anxious about the panel meeting instead. Can't elaborate, but I haven't forgotten you guys! Didn't get home til after 9 or so, and just wanted to relax a bit. on topic...all in all, good news. Rumored that in after hour trading has been anywhere from 14-19, but I haven't seen any actual info on this, so it is only rumor from a friend. Tomorrow will tell us more regarding the short-term movement, although the long-term will need to be followed over just that, the long-term. If anyone loaded up withmore than they are comfortable with as a long-term investment than one has to consider many factors over the next few days or weeks, such as how much was invested for what reasons, as I still believe that a good solid core holding of ATIS in the long haul will be very rewarding. Earnings for dermagraft will matter, but other indications for dermagraft and tc, along with the cartilage study likely getting under way at some point this year, will also matter. Keep in mind companies like Amgen developed pretty high market caps fairly quickly, too, although it is hard to compare with anyone given the new industry, as well as with a company like Amgen, until ATIS proves itself...today wasn't a bad step along the way though. The next question isn't sales as much as actually getting the approval officially. The size of the market cap is still something to keep in mind as one variable here though. Ain't no guarantees that a big move in the next few days will be sustainable, but whether there is a huge move will also need to be seen. Another issue concerned the votes. ORG's 5-4 vote isn't necessarily a bad thing...first, they got recommended. Second, what did the 4 vote...against approval, or against approval without conditions? Keep in mind that the vote is specifically about one thing. for instance, dermagraft's 7-2 vote, actually had one of the 2 against being a big supporter(voted against need for conditions, not against approval, with the other lone vote being the only negative). Many aspects need to be looked at all times. Anyway, it's been a long day, not even taking the panel meeting into effect(sorry, Bill...no celebrations or visits to RAIN), so I'm outta here. Regards, Marshall