Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (2266)	1/30/1998 1:04:00 AM
From: OpenSea	Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, One of my points was that it is equally possible to assume that the TOTAL REVENUE figure that appeared in Brad's post number 132 was incorrect. You would like to assume that the NET INCOME was mis-stated. I would like to assume (hypothetically, of course) that TOTAL REVENUE was mis-stated. Why not? Ira would have to be NUTS to deceive us about NET INCOME. He has clearly stated, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the NET INCOME for 1997 was beyond your estimate of 1 cent per share. If he was intending to deceive us, why would he release audited financials early? Now, if he doesn't come through with the financials soon, you might see me hopping a bit more toward your side. I don' want to sound gullible, but, at the same time, I'm not close to subscribing to the "net profit of $250,000 on $8.5MM in revenue" theory quite yet! I don't ACTUALLY believe that the TOTAL REVENUES were wrong, but I just want to point out that there are other possibilities outside of your supposed "proof." Jim