Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (164076)	10/22/2020 5:19:20 AM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217741

With MMT there's a risk that you can be right for the wrong reasons, and visa versa... or four different ways... It's essentially a series of economic navigation questions... You might be exactly right about how each move you plan "should" alter the course you're on... But, if it turns out you weren't actually where you thought you were when you started out. ? Could end up with an Amelia Earhart economy... leaving history uncertain when and where it really died, or what the final words uttered were... but, in any case... it just never came back... Other issues with $ as "fuel".... plan it just right... but get the mileage wrong... and run out too soon ? Or, "how much debt is too much"... as in Japan... an excess in extra baggage that comes in lots of forms. Its an unknown what the impact of some variables might be... so the tolerances might change over time... and, still, you'll never know when you hit "too much"... until you have... and then there's not much you can do. Lots of uncertainties... all of which leave it unclear that we'll ever benefit from having tested it... But, "we" don't appear likely to get a vote on whether or not the risks will be taken ?