Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (2270)	1/30/1998 1:37:00 AM
From: OpenSea	Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, No. But that's only one possible scenario that runs contrary to your "proof." The scenario I hope for will have a rational explanation that doesn't implicate Ira in any form of deceit. I think this logical exercise has demonstrated another interesting point: That you ARE, in fact, slanted against the company, rather than making an OBJECTIVE analysis that considers ALL of the possible factors, not just the most negative ones. I agree with you that there is a lot of BS hype about this stock here on this thread; but hype and slamming are just two sides of the same coin. Jim

To: Little Engine who wrote (2270)	1/30/1998 2:20:00 AM
From: Andrew H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

LE, just listened to part of the call again. It is true Ira does not state eps as net earnings, but that is almost never done--it is commonly understood that eps is net earnings. However, shortly after that when asked how much of this is recurring income he does give the impression he is talking about net and when asked about the 504K he does say that that is NOT reflected in the net, which gives the distinct impression that he has been talking about the net previous to that. Nothing conclusive, of course, but in context he certainly seems to be referring to the net. If you are correct in your suppositions, Ira would be needlessly opening himself and his company to being sued.

To: Little Engine who wrote (2270)	1/30/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: art	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Little Engine and Lowell on several occasions you have referred to a company named SOS staffing ( SOSS ) which is listed on the Nasdaq. But what you fail to mention is that the way this company has grown their business is by acquisitions: "SOS Staffing Services, a full-service provider of staffing services in 19 states, has acquired several companies in recent months, including firms in Texas, Hawaii and Utah. The company has a network of over 120 offices in the United States." sec.yahoo.com ( to much to copy ) Also noted is that ( SOSS ) has an average volume of approximately 92,000 shares daily as compared to FAMH which probably does five (5) times as much volume on the average . My question is this: when you compare the two companies profit wise and you read their( SOSS ) financial(http//sec.yahoo.com/e/l/s/soss.html ) it appears that FAMH is growing their business in the same fashion. Therefore would you agree at least in principle that FAMH is a good bet based on volume and your comparisons to SOSS that FAMH is an up and forth coming growing business and will grow in value. ART