Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (730157)	10/28/2020 10:18:07 PM
From: Sdgla	Respond to of 793916

Seems the Durham investigation has been shoved into a back corner and all but forgotten.. what a menu of options will be available after the 2nd Trump inauguration.

To: LindyBill who wrote (730157)	10/29/2020 2:30:40 AM
From: t4texas	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bruce L Joe Sixer pak73 PJr Respond to of 793916

i never understand why trump never seems to do something practical (as i would do in this case), such as, get an instant meeting over at doj/fbi building with the chain of custody people who had access and knowledge of that hard disk on that seized laptop. get 'em in a room and get to the bottom of this joe biden national security problem. i would not want a high level presentation. i want to ask questions to start with the people who examined that disk first, knew what was on it, and who was the next level up manager whom they told about it. etc. where did the information upward communication stop, because this disk would have been very helpful before and during the trial in the senate or sooner. what did they think about the info that was on the disk about joe biden, and a ton of questions about that. i could add so much more, but i cannot understand why trump does not do something like this, but he should. his whole fbi and should not escape some damn good explanations as to what happened after the fbi seized the disk. did they even read what was on it?