SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (164482)10/29/2020 7:46:05 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218554
 
RE <<Shouldn't keeping tenant always be numero uno dos tres?>>

I believe so, for the trouble-free tenants.

One time I was approached by real estate agent re some woman wishing to rent

I said fine, get goodwill deposit to lock in the deal until contract done

Deposit came

Then the woman decided she wanted to rent from different lord and wanted her non-refundable deposit back

I ignored her

she then revealed that she was a lawyer (part of the DD in any case for tenancies in HK) for a big full-service broker, threatened trouble, not realising I am a fair-sized client of the same big broker :0)

later she changed her mind and wished to re-engage w/ the apartment she gave up on, and I simply ignored her

I love HK law, works really well

the court system is not gummed-up by frivolity

Another time the property club wished to buy a property, and I put down the non-refundable goodwill deposit (5%) to lock in the deal.

subsequently the vendor's staff via big-time law firm tabled a non-standard sale & purchase agreement w/ terms I cannot wisely agree to. I objected, and the law firm and vendor staff essentially told me to stuff it and give up my deposit.

the law firm was enormous, and the vendor is part of the largest real estate holdings company in asia

my in-law / fellow director was distraught, but as in alas, I knew the wife of the controlling shareholder of the vendor

a few hours later I got a call from the staff, profusely apologising, and helpfully suggested we proceed w/ the deal based on a standard sale & purchase agreement

my in-law that day thought of me as god-sent, not so much for having anything to do w/ the deal going through, but for the sheer happy satisfaction :0)

I do not cotton to lawyers as counter-parties, but I do like the rule of law, and the rule of person.