SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hank Scorpio who wrote (730938)11/5/2020 1:00:57 PM
From: mistermj1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Hank Scorpio

  Respond to of 793818
 
Blockchain may be the answer...and the patent has already been applied for as a voting system.

nerdist.com



To: Hank Scorpio who wrote (730938)11/5/2020 1:01:40 PM
From: Neeka2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
mistermj

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793818
 
From what I can determine Homeland Security manages and produces the ballots. They have to know how many were requested and sent out to the various jurisdictions, and if there are over counts it raises a red flag. I believe that is what is going on in several instances right now. Trump knows it thus the challenge for a recount in Wisc. I believe there will be more.



To: Hank Scorpio who wrote (730938)11/5/2020 2:41:16 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793818
 
I disagree. Modern tech can be built that is rock-solid, and I agree with blockchain as a technology that is perfect for this application.

But you'd really need to replace a lot of federal election law, with something simple.

I'd trust it far more than I do this crap.

Paper is a terrible way of doing things today imo.