SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug R who wrote (11608)1/30/1998 1:10:00 PM
From: Dave H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 79561
 
Doug,EDIT
If you have the chance, take a look at PLCM -- is it breaking out?

EDIT: well, just checked the up-to-the-minute quote and it looks like it's back down to 6 7/8 (b/a 6 7/8 x 7)
Volume is over 2x average though.

-dave



To: Doug R who wrote (11608)1/30/1998 1:18:00 PM
From: Esteban  Respond to of 79561
 
Doug, Edited Message.

So far I still like the odds against.

Me too.

Esteban

Edit: It will be interesting to see if the double gappers bail one out if you get caught in the second gap like SHVA did. I know OXHP and RMDY didn't actually signal before the 2nd gap, but I'm following them anyway. We already know that OXHP recovered from the second gap relatively soon.



To: Doug R who wrote (11608)1/30/1998 2:13:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79561
 
ME TOO

Doug,

"So far I still like the odds against."
Understatement of the year.
It occurs to me, though, that I never threw your challenge back at you, which is most unlike me:
Show me a stock that gapped UP after a signal day.

Ivan
(The whole issue here, of course, is whether to play cats at 3:59 or 9:31)