SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:05:22 PM
From: sylvester804 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
pocotrader
SeachRE
Wharf Rat

  Respond to of 1583677
 
BOMBSHELL: tRumptard postal worker admits fabricating allegations of ballot tampering, officials say
washingtonpost.com



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:06:34 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1583677
 
BOMBSHELL: Trump Pressured GOP Senators Facing Runoffs to Call for Georgia Secretary of State's Resignation: Report
thedailybeast.com



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:08:27 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Land Shark

  Respond to of 1583677
 
tRUMPTARDS ARE JUMPING OFF BRIDGES AS POS tRUMP IS TAKEN IN HANDCUFFS OUT OF WHITE HOUSE
thedailybeast.com



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:14:18 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583677
 
5 DAYS BEFORE ELECTION, WH ATTORNEY DISPATCHED TO AGENCY BLOCKING BIDEN TRANSITION... TRAITOR tRUMP COUP D'ETAT IN PROGRESS BEFORE ELECTION...
Alexander Nazaryan
National Correspondent
Yahoo NewsNovember 10, 2020

WASHINGTON — Five days before the presidential election, President Trump quietly dispatched attorney Trent Benishek of the White House general counsel’s office to the General Services Administration.

The agency, which oversees government leases among other administrative tasks, is little known to the general public. Nor is Benishek’s name among those that have become a staple of Trumpworld reporting.

Accordingly, the move attracted no notice as the nation, and the world, focused on the Nov. 3 presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in modern American history.

There was little but the obligatory press release, which said that as the new general counsel of the GSA, as well as its top ethics official, Benishek would “advise in the formulation and promulgation of GSA policies and regulations, oversee the agency’s litigation, and provide overall direction.”

Then came Trump’s defeat at the hands of his Democratic rival, Joe Biden, announced on Saturday. Even as Biden emerged as the president-elect, Trump persisted in falsely claiming electoral fraud on the part of the Democrats. Republicans have, for the most part, stood by Trump, if not quite as enthusiastically as he may have hoped.



President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters in Wilmington, Del., on Monday. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)In refusing to acknowledge Biden’s victory, Trump has found a critical ally in Emily Murphy, the GSA administrator he appointed in 2017. She has so far declined to provide Biden with the transition resources — namely, office space and money, as well as governmental email accounts — that her agency is legally mandated to offer an incoming president.

The GSA is also supposed to name a federal transition coordinator to facilitate the immensely complex role of turning over the federal bureaucracy from one administration to another. Back in April, Russell Vought, who heads the White House budget office, issued a memorandum instructing federal agencies to comply with the Presidential Transition Act, which was first passed in 1963 and has been amended since then.

That work cannot begin until Murphy “ascertains” the election. As the Washington Post first reported, she has so far refused to so.

Benishek could prove a crucial ally in that effort, Democrats fear. “It can’t be good,” said Kimberly Wehle, a former assistant U.S. attorney. “It could be Trump ensuring that he controls all the potential havoc buttons these last few weeks of his presidency.”

The GSA does not have the power to stop the transition, explained Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who sits on the House Oversight Committee and is an attorney. Certification of the election is completed by the individual states. However, Khanna went on to say, Benishek could direct Murphy to slow down the transition, which could buy the Trump campaign more time to find new means to reverse the will of the American electorate.

“Every day partisan operatives running the Trump GSA dangle critical resources over President-elect Biden’s transition team is a day our national security and public health is dangerously undermined during a global pandemic,” said Kyle Herrig, president of the progressive government watchdog Accountable.US.



GSA Administrator Emily Murphy. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images)One top official who was involved in the Obama transition in 2008 speculated that the young attorney was put there “to keep tabs on Murphy.” The former transition member, who would discuss the matter only on the condition of anonymity, went further, speculating that Benishek “was installed there so the [White House] could fire the administrator and chief of staff, then have [Benishek] take over the agency to stop the ascertainment,” a reference to the process the GSA undertakes during a presidential transition.

Though Murphy is a Republican, she is not a White House insider, meaning that she may not be fully trusted to do the president’s bidding.

“GSA Administrator Emily Murphy must begin the Biden transition without delay,” Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., another member of the House Oversight Committee, told Yahoo News. “The administrator plays a critical role in the peaceful transfer of power and ensuring vital government services are not disrupted. This is all the more important amid a deadly pandemic. She should do the right thing.”

That would be in keeping with the Trump administration’s last-ditch effort to remake the federal bureaucracy in its own image, which has included high-profile moves like Monday’s firing of Pentagon chief Mark Esper, an ouster many predict will be followed by those of CIA Director Gina Haspel and FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Trump has also fired Bonnie Glick, head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, who last Friday became the first senior official to lose her job in the wake of election night.

Many of the personnel moves in recent months have been engineered by Johnny McEntee, a former football player at the University of Connecticut who served as Trump’s “body man” during the 2016 presidential campaign. He later followed the victorious real estate magnate to the White House, only to face an embarrassing dismissal in early 2018 for what were reported to be gambling-related problems.



Johnny McEntee. (Leah Millis/Reuters)McEntee returned to the White House in January, assuming control of the Presidential Personnel Office, despite having none of the managerial executive experience such an office would ordinarily demand. He has spent much of the year ferreting out suspected fifth columnists within the federal bureaucracy and installing Trump loyalists in their place. Those loyalists included college students with no experience in government.

Since the election, McEntee has also been looking to punish any administration officials who may be looking for employment beyond Jan. 20, when Biden will take the oath of office.

A White House communications official told Yahoo News that he could not comment on personnel matters.

McEntee did not respond to a request for comment.

It’s not clear just what the GSA’s continued refusal to cooperate with the Biden transition would accomplish, said Max Stier, the founder of the Partnership for Public Service, which runs the Center for Presidential Transition. The agency does not have the power to either certify or reject the outcome of an election; it is merely supposed to help the winner of that election get ready for office.

“I think it’s a mistake,” Stier said.

Benishek first came to Washington in 2002 as a delegate for youth government, intended to work on mock legislation to “ban flag-burning.”

Later, he served as the finance director for his father, Dan Benishek, who would serve three terms in the House of Representatives as a Republican in the Wisconsin delegation. In 2013, the elder Benishek was accused of improper use of private aircraft, and his son, the future White House lawyer, represented his father before the Federal Election Commission.



Trent Benishek and the General Services Administration building in Washington. (GSA.gov, Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)In a 3-2 ruling, the commissioners decided not to take any action against the congressman. Among those election commissioners was Don McGahn, who would become White House counsel in 2017.

Trent Benishek joined the counsel’s office from Gibson, Dunn, a prestigious law firm with close ties to the upper reaches of the Trump administration.

During his time at the White House, Benishek worked on the impeachment of the president, which began in the summer of 2019 and culminated in an acquittal before a bitterly divided Senate earlier this year.

Benishek is one of 12 attorneys for the president listed as an author of a memorandum on impeachment submitted to the Senate. That memo calls the articles of impeachment “an affront to the Constitution and to our democratic institutions” while denouncing the Democrats’ “rigged process.”

Just what those claims could mean for the GSA is unclear, as the agency tends to stay out of electoral politics — and did, until very recently.

The agency has attracted attention ever since the Trump name came to be emblazoned on the Old Post Office, a grand building just blocks from the White House that is now the Trump International Hotel. Though that now-infamous lease was signed under the Obama administration, the notion of a president acting as a hotelier (through a company he claims he has stepped away from) brought the GSA undesired attention.

Murphy came to the GSA after working for Republicans on Capitol Hill and the Republican National Committee. Democrats have charged her with lax oversight of the Trump hotel lease, in particular regarding spending by foreign governments there.

At a hearing earlier this year, Murphy claimed ignorance of the whole issue. “The only thing I know,” she said, “is what I’ve read in the paper.”



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:20:33 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1583677
 
MORE tRUMP LOSING: Supreme Court appears willing to leave Obamacare in place
PUBLISHED TUE, NOV 10 202011:52 AM ESTUPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
Tucker Higgins @IN/TUCKER-HIGGINS-5B162295/ @TUCKERHIGGINS
cnbc.com

KEY POINTS

The Affordable Care Act seems likely to withstand its third challenge at the Supreme Court.During arguments in a case seeking to eliminate Obamacare, two of the court’s conservatives on Tuesday signaled they would not strike down the landmark legislation.Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested that the court may cast aside the individual mandate while leaving the rest standing.

Supreme Court appears to lean against striking down ACA

The Affordable Care Act seems likely to withstand its third challenge at the Supreme Court.

During arguments in a case seeking to eliminate Obamacare, two of the court’s conservatives on Tuesday signaled they would not strike down the landmark legislation.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who cast the key vote in 2012 upholding Obamacare, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, an appointee of President Donald Trump, suggested that the court may cast aside a challenged provision of the law, known as the individual mandate, while leaving the rest of it standing.

Such a decision would leave in place the central aspects of the 900-plus page legislation, which collectively have transformed American health-care over the past decade, from the expansion of Medicaid in dozens of states to the requirement that insurers cover those with preexisting conditions.

“Today, I think the winner in this case was the Affordable Care Act and Congress,” Michele Goodwin, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, said in an interview after arguments concluded.

The individual mandate provision, as enacted in 2010, requires most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty. The GOP-controlled Congress reduced the penalty to $0 in 2017.

The Supreme Court upheld the mandate in 2012 under Congress’s taxing power, but Texas and other Republican-led states argued that the reduction of the penalty made that justification no longer workable, and as a result the whole Affordable Care Act must be struck down.

The Trump administration, via the Department of Justice, argued in favor of the red states’ challenge.

The court’s six conservatives seemed sympathetic to arguments made by Kyle Hawkins, the Texas solicitor general, and acting Justice Department Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall that the individual mandate became unconstitutional when it was stripped of an accompanying penalty.

But Roberts and Kavanaugh suggested that would not doom the rest of the law.

“I think it’s hard for you to argue that Congress intended the entire act to fall if the mandate was struck down,” Roberts told Hawkins, noting that the same Congress “did not even try to repeal the rest of the act.” Roberts was appointed by President George W. Bush.

Roberts acknowledged that some Republican lawmakers may have wanted the Supreme Court to strike down the law, “but that’s not our job.”

Kavanaugh told Donald Verrilli, who was solicitor general under former President Barack Obama, that “I tend to agree with you that this is a very straightforward case” and that under the court’s precedents “we would excise the mandate and leave the rest of the act in place.”

Verrilli was arguing on behalf of the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives, which along with a coalition of Democratic states led by California was defending Obamacare. Michael Mongan, the solicitor general of California, argued on behalf of the blue states.

Later, Kavanaugh told Hawkins that it “sure seems” like Congress in 2017 wanted to lower the individual mandate penalty without getting rid of the Affordable Care Act’s other provisions, such as its protections for those with preexisting conditions.

While Republicans in Congress repeatedly threatened to repeal the entire Affordable Care Act, the party was never able to muster a majority in the House and Senate willing to do so. An effort at the “skinny repeal” of certain provisions, including the individual mandate, failed in 2017 after the late GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona cast a vote against the effort.

Michael Kimberly, a partner at the law firm McDermott Will & Emery who co-chairs the firm’s Supreme Court and appellate practice group, said that Kavanaugh’s comments were “strikingly direct.”

Kimberly said that Kavanaugh’s comments were out of character, suggesting the judge was trying to signal how he would rule in the case.

“I think the defenders have reason for cautious optimism,” Kimberly said.

The court’s three liberals, Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan appeared ready to side with the blue states and the House of Representatives. It takes five votes to gain a majority on the nine-judge panel.

The Democratic-appointees seemed skeptical of the red states’ argument that the mandate was unconstitutional, and sympathetic to California’s claim that those states lacked even the ability to sue, given their failure to prove that they had been harmed by the law.

“The only thing that changed is something that made the law less coercive,” Kagan said.

Breyer suggested that allowing the red states to bring their claim could open up challenges to all sorts of laws that would be unlawful if they included penalties, such as hypothetical statutes calling for citizens to plant trees, clean up yards or buy war bonds.

The court’s conservatives seemed more amenable to the claim from red states and the Justice Department that the law’s challengers had been harmed.

Roberts noted that if Congress passed a law requiring everyone to mow their lawn once a week, even if there was no penalty, there “will certainly be injury” to those who didn’t comply. Justice Clarence Thomas said that such a law could still have a “chilling effect.”

A ruling siding with the red states by invalidating the individual mandate, but with the blue states by allowing the bulk of the Affordable Care Act to remain standing, would represent a win for Democrats.

Health-care activists said that if the Supreme Court struck down the Affordable Care Act, more than 20 million people could lose their insurance.

The dispute, which was argued in the shadow of last week’s presidential election, was a central focus of Democrats during the confirmation hearings for Justice Amy Coney Barrett last month.

After the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a liberal, died in September, Democrats sought to turn the fight for her replacement, Barrett, into a referendum on the law.

In that regard, Barrett’s questioning on Tuesday was anticlimactic, as it didn’t provide much insight into her thinking about the legal issues.

The case had also become a political flash point in the race between Trump and President-elect Joe Biden, who have sketched out vastly different visions for the future of American health care.

Trump pushed to gut the Affordable Care Act, while Biden’s agenda calls for building on the law, which the former vice president played a role in shepherding through Congress in the first place.

The political stakes were amplified by the pandemic, which has killed more than 230,000 in the U.S. and made health care a more salient issue. Efforts to contain the pandemic also caused a devastating recession, which has resulted in millions losing their health-care coverage.

“The elephant in the room happens to be the political tenor behind all of these issues,” Goodwin said. She noted that given Trump’s attacks on the federal judiciary, the chief justice has had to project an air of neutrality more than previous leaders of the court.

“The chief justice is having to call balls and strikes, and in such away that it is clear the court does abide by the rule of law, and the court under his jurisdiction will not be partisan,” Goodwin said.

“How much of that he controls is limited,” she added. “The reality is this is a court that has been affected by the political tenor of these times.”

Ahead of the case coming to the Supreme Court, two lower courts sided with Texas, including the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals court, and agreed that the individual mandate was unlawful. The appeals court, though, did not say whether the rest of the Affordable Care Act would also have to be struck down.

Arguments, which were scheduled to last for 80 minutes, began at 10 a.m. ET and concluded around noon. They were conducted by phone as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and streamed live to the public.

A decision in the case, known as California v. Texas, No. 19-840, is expected toward the end of June.



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:27:10 PM
From: sylvester803 Recommendations

Recommended By
J_F_Shepard
Land Shark
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1583677
 
tRUMPTARDS JUMPING OFF BRIDGES: BIDEN'S LEAD IN PA INCREASES TO 45,000+ VOTES. HE IS STILL ON TRACK TO A LEAD OF MORE THAN 100,000 VOTES WHEN ALL BALLOTS ARE TALLIED UP. See Pennsylvania results ›



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:30:47 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1583677
 
BIDEN'S LEAD INCREASES IN NV, WI, MI, PA & GA HITTING NEW ALL TIME HIGH AS VOTES CONTINUE COUNTING TO THE LAST VOTE. ALSO AZ LEAD STILL ABOVE 15,000 VOTES AND tRUMP RUNNING OUT OF VOTES FAST...



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (1277756)11/10/2020 7:33:12 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
Wharf Rat

  Respond to of 1583677
 
BOMBSHELL: PA tRUMP FRAUD UNCOVERED; Trump Supporter Arrested For Requesting Absentee Ballot For Dead Mother; Faces up to five years in prison and $25,000 in fines.
The president accuses Democrats of “voter fraud,” but one of his supporters became the first person in a Pennsylvania county charged with the crime in 30 years.
huffpost.com

Trump Supporter Arrested For Requesting Absentee Ballot For Dead Mother
The president accuses Democrats of “voter fraud,” but one of his supporters became the first person in a Pennsylvania county charged with the crime in 30 years.

President Donald Trump has a colorful imagination when it comes to the fictitious specter of “voter fraud.”

Although actual cases of people impersonating a registered voter in order to artificially alter vote totals are infinitesimally rare, Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that mail-in voting, which states have made more available this election cycle due to COVID-19, is a magnet for “fraud.”?

But to the extent that “voter fraud” is a problem this year, Trump might want to take a closer look at his own supporters.

Robert R. Lynn, a registered Republican and Trump supporter in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, was arrested on Wednesday for allegedly requesting an absentee ballot for his mother, who died in 2015.

Lynn, 67, is a resident of Luzerne County, a largely white, working-class, political bellwether that Barack Obama won twice, but which swung hard for Trump in 2016. Lynn is being charged with voter fraud and forgery for faking his deceased mother’s signature on the absentee ballot request form.

County prosecutors have told local news outlets that it is the first case of alleged voter fraud in the county in three decades. County election authorities flagged the ballot request as suspicious in September, triggering the investigation that led to Lynn’s arrest. Lynn allegedly first denied the allegations to detectives, before admitting to the deed.


AIMEE DILGER/SOPA IMAGES/LIGHT ROCKET/GETTY IMAGESSupporters of President Donald Trump filled Harveys Lake in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, in early October. Trump won the historically Democratic area handily in 2016.

Lynn is due in court for a hearing on Nov. 5 ? two days after the election. The Republican, who posted $10,000 in bail, could face up to five years in prison and $25,000 in fines.

Lynn’s Facebook posts show that he is a fan of Trump’s and a bitter critic of Trump’s Democratic opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden.

In one January message, Lynn shared a homemade image of Trump’s campaign logo with the words, “Finally someone with balls.”

In July, Lynn shared a conservative meme about someone who agreed to their neighbor’s request to take down their Trump flag only to replace the flag with dozens of Trump yard signs instead.

And in a since-deleted post from September, Lynn called Biden’s town hall event in Moosic, Pennsylvania, “pathetic.”


ROBERT LYNN/FACEBOOK

Subscribe to the Politics email.
From Washington to the campaign trail, get the latest politics news.

Lynn even amplified conservative concerns about the chaos that Pennsylvania’s expanded mail-in voting options could cause, though he does not appear to have reiterated Trump’s claims of widespread fraud. Lynn shared a Wall Street Journal editorial from September warning that the crush of mail-in ballots could postpone the country’s election results and set up a costly, partisan court battle. “No surprise here, already happened in the PA primaries, this year, so strap on your hanging chads, folks!!” Lynn wrote in his post sharing the editorial.


ROBERT LYNN/FACEBOOK

Trump’s crusade against the phantom voter fraud phenomenon has on at least one occasion led him to encourage his supporters to test the system’s safeguards by engaging in the practice themselves. At a rally in North Carolina in September, he told supporters to mail in their ballots and then vote in person, “and if the system is as good as they say it is then obviously they won’t be able to vote” in person.

The Voter Project, a group working to expose Republican voter suppression efforts and dispel myths about voter fraud, blamed Trump for effectively encouraging voter fraud among his own supporters.

“Donald Trump has tried to spread chaos and disinformation about voter fraud for years and he’s never come up with any evidence,” Voter Project spokesperson Mike Mikus said in a statement. “A byproduct of his misinformation is that nearly every instance of voter fraud in recent years has been Trump’s own supporters because they believe his incessant lying.”