Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (281446)	11/11/2020 12:58:34 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, I mean you are incapable of holding a rational conversation with a knowledgeable person... because you are totally unaware of reality... including in choosing to dismiss "one guy" as if there's nothing else out there, and nothing happening right now that addresses the same subject... making it critically relevant to understand, if you do want to understand the world... instead of constantly being surprised by it... in a way necessitating your outrage when your bubble gets burst... When things that are obvious... surprise you all the time... What's the problem ? But, you'll choose ignorance, instead ? Except... I'm not sure you're capable of making choices for yourself... since you're not ALLOWED to see that which has been deemed unseeable by your monitors and overlords in the media and tech ? It's not that you can't find it with some effort... but they don't want you to see it ? And you refuse to see it... to determine for yourself if they don't want you to see it because its wrong... or if they don't want to see it because its right. You'd rather be uninformed and "accepted"... than run the risk of being labelled for resisting censorship ? And... you're OK with having the news be censored... to prevent you getting information that might conflict with what you've been told and believe... that isn't true ? The instance... is ONE instance. It is hardly the only one ? And, it appears you are willing to allow your news to be censored "to protect you"... from information that might cause a bit too much cognitive dissonance for you to handle... Do you know what Hammer and Scorecard are ? What their origins are ? How they work ? Who created the program ? What the people that created it say about it and how it works ? How it escaped from the NSA to become "privately controlled" ? Hmmm. If not, why not ? How will Pinchai explain to Cruz what Google is doing now... much less explain having lied to the Senate ? Meanwhile in Pennsylvania... the state continues to prevent the law being followed in how the vote count is conducted... in spite of a judge already having ruled that, yes, the state has to follow the law... They're now proceeding as before, while violating the court order... and doubling down on doing what the judge said they cannot do ? Has that EVER happened in an American election ? Has essentially the same thing happened to disrupt voting in multiple states AT THE EXACT SAME TIME ? Trump won North Carolina. All the evidence suggests he'll win Arizona. Pennsylvania's "result" is so badly spoiled that the courts will probably have to throw it out since they're refusing to comply with the law... making the result they produce unlawful. Fraud in Michigan is obvious enough... and apparently well enough isolated... that Trump will probably win Michigan by a wide margin. Wisconsin similarly riddled with fraud... There has never been an election in our history in which the frauds are as extensive... and as well documented... as this time ? That's curious. The effort to "call the election" by the media... is a total fraud. A reality check shows that not a single race has been certified yet ? Hmmm. How can they call an election... when not a single race has been won yet... and MANY are in serious disputes that appear to strongly favor Trump winning ? FWIW... media "projections"... no matter how aggressively misrepresented... have ZERO legal standing... But, we have seen that before... You do remember President Gore, right ? If DEMOCRATS believed in law and order... if they believed in not violating the terms of their contracts.... then they wouldn't be cheating in elections... and not following the law even after having judges rule they must ? I agree with what you said about the rule of law... just don't see any evidence you believe it.