SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (731981)11/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
From: pheilman_4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bruce L
frankw1900
J.B.C.
Tom Clarke

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793912
 
The Dominion machines were stealing votes in a crafty way. As a machine saw straight Republican votes exceed 25% it began switching individual votes for Trump to Biden. The benefit of this cheat algorithm is that the machine could operate with only local knowledge.

How can we see this in the aggregate totals?
  1. Coat tails but no coat. Dominion only stole Trump votes.
  2. More blacks and hispanics votes for Trump this election vs. 2016. Less white votes.
  3. Mismatches in handcounts vs machine counts.
Here is a plot from another source:


The x-axis is the percentage of straight party votes. The % of people just filled in the Republican bubble to get a straight party vote. The y-axis is a bit tricky to understand, it is the difference between the Straight party votes and the Trump votes. The expected shape of this plot should be noise around the center line, pretty much higher Republican precincts will have higher votes for Trump.

More thoughts, the rest of the democrats should be pissed as they cranked up the theft only for Biden!!

Dr Shiva found this because he was running and grew suspicious of the voting results. He found that in the hand counted precincts it was a flat line as expected and in machine counted districts it was a clear parabolic curve. Nassim Talib points out that skin in the game is critical to good outcomes. Also, don't screw around with an algorithm to cheat an MIT Doctoral polymath.