SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: medsunman who wrote (13965)1/30/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
About all I can do in that regard, is address the wine changing hands. Andy should have just received his two bottles of McGuigan Brothers, The Black Label.



To: medsunman who wrote (13965)1/30/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Here's the AP report on the baldness gene:

By Stephen Hart
ABCNEWS.com
Picture a future with no toupees and
no razors, when a mere cream will
raise hair on bald pates and another
will prevent stubbly growth on chins
and legs.
Thanks to a
Pakistani family with
inherited baldness and a
hairless strain of mutant
mice, the future may not
be so far off.
A multi-national
research team reports in
the January 30 issue of
the journal Science that
they've discovered a
gene that directly affects
hair growth.
"This is the first gene
that's involved in
regulating the hair cycle," says Columbia
University scientist Angela M. Christiano,
who did the research with colleagues in
Pakistan, the United States and Britain.
"Most people think of the (hair growth)
cycle as being like a clock," she explains.
Hairs grow from small sockets called
follicles, which automatically go through their
paces: After a period of hair growth, the
cells rest. Then the hair falls out, triggering a
new round of follicle activity.
"Without passing through certain
checkpoints, a hair follicle can't really reach
the next phase" in the cycle, says Christiano.
When the system bogs down, hair simply
doesn't grow.
. Christiano's hunt for the gene began with
a Pakistani family among which four living
men and seven living women were born with
no eyebrows or eyelashes. Their head hair
appeared normal at birth, but never regrew
after a ritual shave at a week of age. None
of these people ever grew armpit or pubic
hair.

Slippery Mutant
The new gene triggers only the rare type of
baldness that ran in this family. But all hair
loss probably involves some genetic
disruption of the hair growth cycle, perhaps
in conjunction with hormonal or
environmental factors. Male pattern
baldness, the most common type, affects
both men and women and causes some
degree of hair loss in up to 80 percent of the
population.
At first, Christiano's team identified an
area of a chromosome where they thought
they'd find the gene responsible for the
Pakistanis' baldness. But they drew a blank
when they tried to match the data to a gene
database. "We were desperate, actually,"
she says.
To solve the mystery, they turned to a
strain of mice called hairless. "The mice are
born with baby hair that falls out," says
Christiano, exactly what was happening in
the Pakistani family. Other researchers had
used the hairless strain to test cosmetics, but
no one had thought to investigate their
baldness.
The gene that caused the mice to lose
their hair turned out to lie in the same
chromosomal region identified in the
Pakistani family, and there Christiano finally
found a small mutation in the human version
of the mouse hairless gene.
She thinks it may act as a control switch
for hair growth. "At least this gene allows us
to ask the question, `What turns it on and
what does it then turn on?' " she says.
"This is a very beautiful piece of work,"
comments David Schlessinger, chief of the
Laboratory of Genetics at the National
Institute on Aging, who called the study an
excellent example of human genetic science.
"It's an entry point toward the possibility of
curing baldness or preventing it."

Heads Up
A method for delivering the gene may
already lie at hand. In 1995, scientists at a
California company called AntiCancer
worked out a method for getting genes into
hair follicles. They packaged the genes in
small fatty droplets called liposomes and
essentially rubbed them on the skin of mice.
Some follicle cells took up the test genes,
which actually worked to grow hair.
Christiano sees no insurmountable barrier
to developing hair growth or prevention
products for humans based on this
technology.
"We already know that taking the gene
down will cause hairlessness," she says. "It's
just a question of turning the gene back on."
Or you could do both-turn it off to grow
hair on your head and on to stop hair growth
on the face or legs.
Schlessinger is more cautious. "It's a goal
that can be worked for," he says. "It's
imaginable, but at this point, I don't think it
would be directly feasible."
The next research step seems obvious,
says Christiano: "Put the gene in a liposome
and smear it on the backs of these mice and
see if they grow hair. If they do, then I guess
we'll be doing a clinical trial in Pakistan."



To: medsunman who wrote (13965)1/30/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
medsunman, After reading the AP report, I realized that the baldness gene discovery may be more impotant to LGND than I thought. When I read about trying to use the gene to restore hair, I thought that the researchers were taking a rather narrow approach. Since there was a structural relationship between the hairless gene and the estrogen or androgen receptors, then related hormones could be just the right medicine. There have already been reports of topical applications of estrogens restoring hair in mice and they could be cross reacting with the hairless gene product (or another related zinc finger transcription factor).

Thus the find may speed development of estrogens (or anti-androgens). As you know, LGND has extensive programs in both areas, and using the hairless gene product (receptor) as a screening vehicle, may yield some fast and exciting results.



To: medsunman who wrote (13965)1/30/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 32384
 
LGND trying real hard to close at $11.