To: Noneyet who wrote (26470 ) 1/30/1998 3:26:00 PM From: rd greer Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
Thomas, then how can you, in any kind of conscience, QUESTION FTEL's facts, potential, market, products, or it's proponents? If you don't believe "much of what is said" about this company, then you'll never be satisfied. IF FTEL spokespersons give you "hype" and "sensationalism," I remember that as being against the SEC rules of 1933 if they are inaccurate or misleading. And you CAN take action against them. Judith had serious questions about the company. I recall vividly her concerns, expressed in a clear and concise manner. She either was or was not satisfied with the answer, or at least enough so that she expressed her gratitude to those who addressed them with her. That's all anyone can do. If, however, you refuse to call the company, refuse to believe "much of what is said" elsewhere, you will never be satisifed and should spend all your time reading S1's (from any company). If your ONLY source of information, other than the Fed filed documents, is going to be this thread, you're wasting ALL of our time, yours included. rd *****Message 3304457 "...Without referencing your post, for reason's only you will understand, I would point out that most recently even you had serious questions regarding your investment in this company. Please let it suffice to say, that you posted them on this forum and I guess to anyone who would or could answer you. So in answer to your suggestion that I or we call ftel, I would say, to what avail ?, to hear more sensationalism ? I am not here to feed an ego nor can I afford the time. Frankly, I don't believe much of what is said about Ftel and hopefully, I can temper some of that with my questions. We both know the answers to most of my questions are sincerely hard to obtain from any source. The only hard documented facts re: ftel are the SEC documents it files."