SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (12205)1/30/1998 4:12:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
The porn industry would probably go along with this. They already are somewhat
self-policing but that doesn't approach 100% effectiveness. Being allowed complete
business freedom by adopting .sex, which is easily filtered, is a smart and easy choice for
them. Less legal hassles for them, more effective protection for kids. Everybody wins.


Bill,

Excellent idea. You need to sell this one:-)

Glenn



To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (12205)1/30/1998 5:08:00 PM
From: Dick Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
New internet DNS names...

Bill Ulrich suggests "What they should add is .sex."

But it's trivial to get around that restriction... just access the site by IP number instead. What 15 year old geek can't figure out that one....?

Dick



To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (12205)2/2/1998 8:05:00 PM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
inre .sex

GREAT idea. It'll never fly though. It's too easy and makes too much sense.<G>