SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Julius Wong who wrote (165338)11/22/2020 9:41:32 AM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219765
 
Lol,, well at least he is rated as a good father.

Secondly, he still seems to be able to laugh ...is that natural or contrived ?

Must be contrived, as he is a pot smoking,, drug taking,, alcoholic, according to the article.He’s complicated.

Haim will like the article .



To: Julius Wong who wrote (165338)11/22/2020 11:52:50 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Julius Wong
marcher

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219765
 
Most interesting part is below

Musk aggressively railed against her, asking why she had hair on her face (referring to the slight peach fuzz that everyone has, visible under the bright light of the club's awning). "Because I'm a mammal," the girlfriend replied, which only pissed Musk off even more.

"There is a high level of degenerate behavior with Elon," one person who knows Musk told me. "There's a paranoia: Are you with me or against me?" Musk's hyper energy is sometimes uncomfortable to be around, this person added: "I genuinely want to leave the room sometimes when he walks in." And, while he can even come across as a "bully," they noted that Musk is not alone among tech titans in this character trait. "All of these guys, I've spent time with them, Musk, Zuck, all of them; they all exhibit tendencies of total and complete pathological sociopathy. They don't at their core give a flying fuck about you or me as individuals."

They do, however, all seem to give a shit what people think of them. Usually, when the tides of praise turn against someone of such stature, they hire consultants, lobbyists, and public relations firms to get them puff pieces in national news outlets, or they agree to give talks at major tech conferences, as long as the questions are little bitty softballs. Most of these CEOs and tech leaders are so obsessed with their image that they employ armies of communications experts, who help craft their brilliance for all to see. Executives I've covered in Silicon Valley almost always have teams prep them for interviews with long lists of all the possible questions they might be asked, and a long list of highly scrutinized answers.



To: Julius Wong who wrote (165338)11/22/2020 10:04:06 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219765
 
Just pray the twitterholic stays physically healthy

His mind is perfect for minting money in our strange age

He mints the funding currency that I use to find my other wager, bitcoins, which I often-enough think of as a bubble or worse, a fraud

But, never mind the distinction as the beast rises

Whenever I read articles like below, I am reminded of internet 1996-98

Some hints to genuine merit, a lot of fluff, and frauds

Iow, early days

bloomberg.com

Why Tomorrow’s Money Will Come in New Crypto Flavors

Olga Kharif
21 November 2020, 18:00 GMT+8
Five years ago, Bitcoin and its cousins in cryptocurrency seemed so unimportant that central banks could hardly be bothered to sneer at them. Now central banks in small countries like the Bahamas and big ones like China are rolling out digital currencies of their own, with the European Central Bank and the U.S. Federal Reserve watching closely. And these days, Bitcoin seems almost traditional compared with a raft of other new developments that might be pointing to a new path forward for money -- or toward more of the ups and downs, scams and sudden fortunes that have marked much of the crypto era. Here’s a guide to some of the ideas that could transform the world of finance.

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)Central banks already deal with electronic versions of money, but a digital currency could extend some services that central banks provide to financial institutions to the public at large. A broadly used digital currency could mean payments clear more rapidly and make banking services available to the estimated 1.7 billion people around the world who lack them. The People’s Bank of China, the most aggressive of the large central banks, has held trials involving e-wallets in a few cities. Transactions with central bank currencies wouldn’t be anonymous — that would make it easier for governments to crack down on money laundering and tax evasion and, as privacy advocates note, give them a powerful new tool for surveillance. The PBOC and other central banks sped up their efforts after Facebook Inc. and a slew of collaborators last year unveiled plans for a digital currency called Libra. For central bankers, currency isn’t merely an economic issue; it’s about sovereignty.



The People’s Bank of China has held trials involving e-wallets in a few cities.

Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg

DeFiWhat if computer code could take the place of bankers? That’s the goal of the decentralized finance, or DeFi, movement that’s grown out of a decade of experimentation with crypto­currencies. A DeFi world could be one where money flows more efficiently and cheaply, its proponents say, and would create new ways for savers to earn money on their holdings. Critics say DeFi is more likely reinventing the hype, wild speculation, and money-losing possibilities of crypto. DeFi revolves around applications known as dapps that perform financial functions on digital ledgers called blockchains. Dapps let people lend or borrow funds from others, go long or short on a range of assets, trade coins or earn interest in a savings-like account. The transactions are governed by rules embedded in the software called smart contracts. Like everything else in the realm of digital currencies, or software in general, DeFi accounts can be vulnerable to hackers. Even buggy code can destroy value. Users wiping themselves out by accident is dismayingly common, too.

Yield FarmingWhen you deposit money in a bank, you’re effectively making a loan that earns interest. Yield farming, or yield harvesting, typically involves lending crypto­currency in return for interest and sometimes for fees, but more ­importantly for handouts of units of a new crypto­currency. The real payoff comes if that coin appreciates rapidly. The most basic approach is to lend digital coins, such as Dai or Tether, through a dapp such as Compound, which then lends the coins to borrowers who often use them for speculation. Interest rates vary with demand, but for every day’s participation in the Compound service, you get new Comp coins, plus interest and other fees. If the Comp token appreciates — it almost doubled in value in June — your returns skyrocket as well, though a crash shortly thereafter showed the risk that accompanies the hoped-for reward.

DexA decentralized exchange, or dex, is a set of software protocols that buyers and sellers can use to find each other and carry out transactions through smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements. Teams of developers set up dexes that then run on their own. Their use has ballooned this year, largely as a result of an explosion in the issuance of DeFi coins used in yield harvesting and otherschemes promising huge returns. Unlike many centralized exchanges, most dexes have welcomed new DeFi coins with open arms, letting them list with little scrutiny and for free. As these coins (including Comp, Dai and SNX) garnered followers, so did the ­decentralized exchanges willing to host them. But along with the risks of hacking that all exchanges face, it remains to be seen whether regulators will let dexes — with their reluctance to check users’ identities — carry on with their wide-open operating style if they continue to grow.

Governance TokensIn a decentralized enterprise, who gets to decide all the many things that get decided? In big disputes over the future course of Bitcoin, for example, whoever gets the most computing power on their side often wins, though the losers sometimes split off their transactions to create, in effect, a new currency, such as Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Gold. To avoid that kind of messy battle without creating a central authority or entity, a slew of new crypto projects is instead relying on so-called governance tokens for decision-making. They’re often issued to regular token users, or with investments in Libra or other projects. Holders can vote on the project’s strategy and any other issues that come up. The idea is to govern projects via a distributed network of stakeholders. There’s also the hope of making a newly minted variety of cryptocoin more attractive. If the arrangement seems reminiscent of the votes that come with shares of stock, that’s on purpose. A big question is whether the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will deem governance tokens to be so much like equity shares that it will require startups to go through a formal public offering — a hurdle that all but ended an earlier craze of raising money through ICOs, or initial coin offerings.

The Reference ShelfBloomberg QuickTakes on CBDC’s,the People’s Bank of China’s digital yuan and Libra and stablecoins.Bloomberg QuickTakes on DeFi and yield farming.Bloomberg QuickTakes on Bitcoin and its competitors and on blockchain technology, plus Walmart’s description of how blockchain is used to trace salad greens.The Bank of International Settlementspublished a roundup of central banks and digital currency plans, while the IMF conducted a review of the subject.Resources from the Bank of Englandand the Bank of Canada on central bank digital currencies.A beginner’s guide to DeFi.— With assistance by Alastair Marsh, and Carolynn Look

Sent from my iPhone