Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (38999)	11/27/2020 2:14:03 PM
From: Qualified Opinion	1 Recommendation Recommended By GROUND ZERO™ Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 73657

It's going to SCOTUS. PA appeals court rejects PT's claims.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (38999)	11/27/2020 4:33:07 PM
From: RetiredNow	1 Recommendation Recommended By GROUND ZERO™ Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 73657

Election theft and the Audacity of Evil Newt Gingrich wrote, "Laziness leads to sloppiness, and sloppiness is how the most brazen heist in American history is being exposed." Let me tell you where he is wrong. Gingrich was correct in his next paragraph, "Stealing the 2020 election was a mammoth undertaking, involving widespread lawlessness and illicit partnerships between private actors and public officials. They’ve been working to cover their tracks since Election Day, but they didn’t work fast enough. Now, the courts need to stop them from destroying any more evidence so that the people of Pennsylvania — and the rest of the country — can accurately assess the ramifications of their wrongdoing."Which is why he was incorrect in his first paragraph. These people were good enough to plan and execute a heist involving 10 million ballots in 11 key states (the six they swiped plus their failed attempts in Iowa, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas; why do you think Fox was so slow in calling those last two states). They could have done so stealthily. Instead they wanted to get caught. They wanted to rub their theft in the noses of their opponents. This is an act of political sabotage. Like all terrorist acts, the perpetrators want full credit. The left already has caused Americans to lose faith in the press, in the government, and in science. Donald John Trump gave us one last hope in that we could defeat Satan at the polls. This year, his minions took that away from us. My guess is they have been stealing elections for years. Perhaps they underestimated President Trump in 2016. Certainly, he was not the first political opponent that Obama had the FBI spy on. The Russian Collusion conspiracy was a cover story that proved to be unnecessary because no one in the press and very few people in Congress cared about. A scandal requires outrage. The tree falling in the woods makes no sound if no one hears it. Spygate has fallen. They thought Electiongate would too. Gingrich gave a great outline of the computer rigging and mail-in fraud that Democrats engaged. Likely Democrats used CIA technology to treat our election like a third-world election. And that is fitting. Decades of complacency post-Reagan have allowed the deep state to proliferate. The federal government grew while the nation sank, and Red China became a world power. Say, you don't think that somehow all those Maoist professors who taught all our undersecretaries may have had something to do with that. No, that's crazy talk. Obama was sworn to defend the Constitution. He would not sell us out like that, right? This week marked the 157th anniversary of the Gettysburg Address. I was part of the last generation to memorize it. The 150th anniversary went unmarked by Obama because the idea that white people sacrificed their lives to set 6 million black slaves free does not fit his narrative. Besides, now we have government of the government, by the government, and for the government. Gingrich knows well the power of the deep state. He and Bill Clinton cut a deal to balance the budget. Within a year, Clinton was impeached and Gingrich was out as House speaker because of their affairs. They also took out Gingrich's hand-picked successor, selecting instead an easily blackmailed pedophile who served his purpose and then served time in prison. The audacity of the 2020 election theft lies not just in stealing the election but in being — as Gingrich said — so brazen about the act. They want this to be the last free election. They wanted to be caught because that demoralizes the opposition. Only one person stands between them and mission accomplished, and President Donald John Trump won't stand down. God won't let him. We will see in the next few weeks what the Supreme Court decides to do with this blatant election theft.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (38999)	11/28/2020 2:21:21 PM
From: yard_man	2 Recommendations Recommended By GROUND ZERO™ Thomas M. Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 73657

Ok. I posted this to Fascist Book -- just because: >> In 2008 Barack Obama received 69.5M votes In 2012 Barack Obama received 65.9M Votes It is alleged that in this election Joe Biden received 80.1M Votes (Note also it is alleged that Donald Trump received 73.9M votes -- keep that number in the back of your mind.) That's differences of (Biden - Obama): +10.6M Votes and +14.2M Votes for Biden over what Obama received in two prior elections where a democrat won. Let's consider 3 possible explanations for these total vote differences -- the third one below, I consider the most rational explanation for this. If you are democrat -- you may like number 2) better. If you buy explanation number 1 -- seek counseling!! 1) Joe Biden is such a dynamic, and energetic campaigner with so many thoughtful and nuanced solutions to all the problems (government manufactured or other) that -- forgive me -- plague us at present. He just got a lot of folks who hadn't participated before excited enough to vote that weren't all that interested when Obama was running. 2) Joe Biden wasn't particularly dynamic or original, but there was such a thorough disgust for the current president with a LARGE (should we say Yuuuge?) segment of the population and with the media harping on the idea that "this was the most important election evvvvver!!" people who weren't excited about Obama or as disgusted with his rivals -- came out in droves to "get that dreadul man out of the White House." 3) Instead, what if, there were a smaller part of the population very enraged at the current president (examples abound in the MSM and in the tech giants -- obviously) and saw an illness as an opportunity to cheat in the election via mail-in ballots and computerized voting. Plans in place. Feeling pretty confident. They had, to start, what they thought was easily an acceptable margin of votes they could by cheating -- beat Trump. Then something awful happened on election night. Turnout for Trump was much, much larger than anticipated. Panic on election night -- it was not going to be enough to simply swap a few votes here in a given proportion to defeat Trump. To win -- the voting would have to be stopped and there would have to be large -- but not too large injections of votes into the system to get Biden to squeak by in the important metro areas. Dem cheaters did not expect to HAVE to do this. Hence, as it is alleged -- ballot dumps were added more quickly than they could have been physically counted. <<