Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (165550)	11/28/2020 10:47:48 PM
From: gg cox	Respond to of 219538

<<< fairly sure hydrogen creation cost can be lowered as popularity / scale grows, otoh, and>>> Properties of obstinate hydrogen do not change because of popularity or scale.as Musk has pointed out. Governments can not change that ,,by subsidizing ,,pouring money into black vortex not good. Private enterprise the true test for green hydrogen economy and as stated in last few posts why do that?? Why lose on the deal ,, when green solar and wind power already in hand. << otoh, quite confident that cost accounting shall be amended to include the lessening of environmental cost due to hydrogen-isation of the economy to make the book look more enticing>> That is far out look,, and hope ,, and how would you get there when,, at the get go ,,it is never ending not efficient losing trade, << my issue w/ better and hydrogen is just one, what makes them physically blow up, and what's to prevent them from doing so when inconvenient, I.e when we are near the device>> Science and fact and “opinion Musk” ..tells us that hydrogen is most volatile ,, pipelines no,,trucking ,very complicated and costly ,, where?? .. the never ending losing deal in Haim’s neighborhood,, and millions more hoods,,,not mine.