Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Madharry who wrote (65559)	12/1/2020 1:29:09 AM
From: bruwin	Respond to of 78774

I suspect Spekulatius was killing 2 birds with one stone and using his one post to reply to the following 2 posts .... Message 33066812 Message 33061130

To: Madharry who wrote (65559)	12/1/2020 10:14:19 AM
From: JohnyP	1 Recommendation Recommended By E_K_S Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78774

My take on MAC: Let's assume a worst case valuation of its real estate based on cap rate. Q3 should be the worst case scenario and we would expect numbers to improve going forward. Based on that low NOI of $152 million for Q3, if we annualize it, it will be 4*152 = $608 million. For a cap rate at 6% the assets of MAC are worth 608/0.06 = $10.1 Billion. Looking at the balance sheet: The real estate assets on the books are around $8Billion including the joint ventures. Therefore, real estate is understated on the books by at least $2.1 Billion, and this while using the most conservative numbers. If we use NOI of all centers for Q3 the value of assets would be higher. Now MAC has an equity of $2,4 Billion on the books. Adding an extra hidden $2,1 Billion under a very conservative scenario would give a book value of $4.5 B. With current market cap at $1,6 Billion there seems to be a big margin of safety for the stock to double or triple in the next years. Let me know if I am missing something!