Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (734360)	12/8/2020 5:18:29 PM
From: carranza2	8 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee burlegoat D. Long isopatch locogringo and 3 more members Respond to of 793806

Well, I took a minute to glance at the suit. It presents only a question of law, i.e., whether the defendant States violated the Constitution by having the rules changed by their respective executive officers rather than by their Legislatures? Damn, that’s clever. No real fact-finding required. No claim of fraud being litigated. A simple yes or no answer that I think the Court can readily handle if it gets past standing. Very, very interesting. I lost a bit of my skepticism but still think it is an uphill battle.

To: D. Long who wrote (734360)	12/8/2020 5:19:43 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793806

Breaking: Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to nullify Biden win in Pennsylvania