Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scripts who wrote (8512)	1/31/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Quinn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14627

I concur with Darren and his post 8486: No P/R is bad P/R. There are firms on the ASE, TSE and VSE that have little or no cash some so-so properties and a tenuous future that trade far higher than PFG because Management promotes. I have to think that there are a lot of disillusioned institutional managers out there, with PFG on their books at $6.00+. I have said on many occasions on this thread, PFG should hire a professional firm, or a professsional that know what he/she is doing, to create awareness in the market place to elevate the stock price to realistic levels. If PFG goes to the market for additional funds, and they would have to if ABX walks (chances are slim and nil, and slim just left town) surely it's better, when the price is elevated. Food for thought.