SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Maloney who wrote (435424)12/9/2020 12:32:04 PM
From: Horgad3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
ggersh
Maple MAGA

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
My guess would be that judges in general are not interested in the math or statistics or probabilities, but rather in hard evidence. Anybody who has looked at the numbers related to this election should at least go "hmmmmm", before passing judgment.

Myself, I don't much give a rat's ass which one these corrupt loser ends up in office. And, IMHO, it may well be the case that one side out cheated the other.



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (435424)12/9/2020 3:21:47 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 436258
 
So the SC is fos? Cause apparently that is where this is headed.

I guess you missed the dems in PA loading 4 boxes of ballots into the scanner after shooing the press and R monitors away....or did Rachel miss that news?

washingtontimes.com