Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonefish who wrote (1284440)	12/21/2020 7:44:15 PM
From: Land Shark	Respond to of 1574096

“Had” vs “has”... two very differently meaning words. Has means he at sometime in the past possessed something. Has means currently possesses. Saddam has destroyed some WW I vintage WMD’s and had decommissioned the nuclear program... he no longer had WMD’s, but sure he at one point HAD WMD’s. Leading up to the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, Saddam was no immediate security threat with regards to WMD’s or his military capacity. So the justification for Bush’s invasion and occupation of Iraq was a farce.