Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (166429)	12/27/2020 4:50:16 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218633

JPM can keep loaning at that rate as long as BTC going up faster, and the customer would be buying BTC from wherever, only depositing w/ JPM in its custodian role In the example I gave, the customer's BTC at JPM would always be the 1 BTC deposited / entrusted to JPM, and customer never sell it until kingdom-come When the kingdom comes, either JPM stops w/ the loan program when BTC stops rising, or the customer passes on, (better math in the latter case), the customer's heir would inherit the BTC at stepped up basis just like any other financial asset, and carry on the tradition. The BTC was and would never be sold. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the event that JPM makes a market, the math would be different, but can be worked out