Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sheila rothstein who wrote (46492)	1/31/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: Michael Coley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

RE: Another Theory on the Q4 Tie Rate Drop. Here's a question that I'd like to throw out to the group: Are the number of disks sold more a function of drives sold in the quarter or total installed base? All along, we've been assuming that it's a function of the drives sold in the quarter. That's an easy assumption to make since we calculate it based on the quarterly sales of disks / drives. But I don't necessarily think that's accurate. I have approximate quarterly Zip unit sales in a spreadsheet, and I compared the quarter-to-quarter unit growth rates with the quarter-to-quarter installed base growth rates, and found something quite remarkable. For Q1 96 - Q3 97, the installed base grew slightly faster than the quarterly unit sales. Q4 was a striking contrast. The amazing unit increase of 62% dwarfed the installed base increase of 36%. (Also, the installed base increased significantly more than the unit sales in Q2 96, Q3 96, and Q1 97.) In my forward projections, I see installed base increasing more than unit sales in Q1 97, then for a leveling out for the rest of the year. If tie rates are indeed correlated with installed base rather than unit sales for the quarter, we'll see the tie rates bounce back in Q1 and stay at the same level for the rest of the year. - Michael Coley - wwol.com

To: sheila rothstein who wrote (46492)	2/1/1998 4:39:00 AM
From: Robert Skinner	Respond to of 58324

Shelia. Your request for why I would buy a inordinate amt of IOM has not fallen on deff ears. I will reply as soon as I have anough IOM myself. For now I like it becouse it is undervalued. It's last Q report earnings, PE, growth size. I also like the advetising. After all whats a company suppost to do with the money they make? There suppost to invest it to make more money. It's really a no brainer. Rember I was hopping to get more cheeper. Well it took off before I had as much as I wanted. So now i'm left with the unpleasent task of chasing it up. Something I really don't like. Hoping for some good dips. Best to you and your just right wt. Bob