All right Sir. Calling a lady "Sir" is okay.
I was saving this for the Grammar Thread but as long as it's for a good cause, then
>> >>We'll begin with box, >>: The plural is boxes, >>: But the plural of ox, >>: Should be oxen, not oxes. >> >>: One fowl is a goose, >>: And two are called geese, >>: But the plural of mouse, >>: Should never be meese. >> >>: You may find a lone mouse, >>: Or a whole nest of mice, >>: But the plural of house, >>: Is houses, not hice. >> >>: If the plural of man, >>: Is always called men, >>: Why shouldn't the plural, >>: Of pan be called pen? >> >>: Cows in the plural, >>: May be called cows or kine, >>: But a bow, if repeated, >>: Is never called bine, >>: And the plural of vow, >>: Is vows, never vine. >> >>: If I speak of a foot, >>: You show me two feet, >>: But if I give you a boot, >>: Would a pair be two beet? >> >>: If one is a tooth, >>: And a whole set are teeth, >>: Why shouldn't the plural, >>: Of booth be called beeth? >> >>: If a singular's this, >>: And the plural is these, >>: Should the plural of kiss, >>: Ever be keese? >> >>: And the one may be that, >>: And the two may be those, >>: Yet hat in the plural, >>: Would never be hose, >>: And the plural of cat, >>: Is cats and not cose. >> >>: We speak of brother, >>: And also of brethren, >>: But the way we say mother, >>: We never say methren. >> >>: Then the masculine pronouns, >>: Are he, his and him, >>: But are the feminine, >>: She, shis and shim? >> >>: So English, I think, >>: You will agree, >>: Is the funniest language, >>: You ever did see. >> >>: Author unknown >> >>Is the plural of spouse "spice?" >> >> |