Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (736914)	1/7/2021 10:04:57 AM
From: Hank Scorpio	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB skinowski Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793917

I just don't get this circular logic. She will have more power than any VP in recent history. And now that's bad. Well, don't worry Obamala, Romney is still a Senator.

To: LindyBill who wrote (736914)	1/7/2021 12:03:57 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793917

An interesting take on things, though I disagree. Having her cast the deciding vote means that the Dems, if they vote along party lines, can ram their programs down our throats. And there is no guarantee that we will take over the House in 2022, though historically the party that wins the Presidency often loses the House in the subsequent election. I appreciate a lot of the pundits trying to make silk out of a sow's ear, but the fact is that the Dems can do whatever they want now. How that translates as being bad for Kamala is a mystery to me.