SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: larry oertel who wrote (1491)2/1/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Gary Hoyer  Respond to of 16960
 
** Review and benchmarks of Diamond's Monstor 3D II **

This a very good review. Looks like Diamond has another real winner on their hands. Particularly interesting is how well the card's performance scales to the more powerful cpus. Here's the direct link:

tomshardware.com

Gary.



To: larry oertel who wrote (1491)2/1/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: BACRDI  Respond to of 16960
 
HOT REVIEW FROM PARIS

Here are the conclusions on VD2 from Tom check it out

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..

Conclusion

We all expected a winner when 3Dfx announced the Voodoo2. The Diamond Monster 3D II shows that we weren't disappointed. I have hardly ever tested any computer hardware product that impressed me as much as this 3D graphics board. I can even go as far as saying that everyone who wants to play 3D games and doesn't get a Voodoo2 board has to be considered as seriously retarded. The Monster 3D II shows that

1.it's sets a new standard in 3D performance as well as quality 2.it can be used with weak as well as powerful CPUs, it will always offer the best 3D performance 3.it gives you mind blowing high 3D performance in systems with at least a K6 233 4.it will currently be hard to find any 3D game that will use the vast performance offered by Voodoo2 5.two boards running SLI will currently not bring you any advantage, because the performance of a single card is already amazing enough and what does it give you if Quake II runs at 150 fps? 6.boards with less than 4 MB frame buffer memory are obsolete in my eyes, because the performance at 800x600 is so high, that is would be a waste if you couldn't use it

If I ever felt well recommending a product that is just about to be released, then it is now with Diamond's Monster 3D II. I wonder which reason could be serious enough for not getting this card, but getting a second rate 3D board instead. Who was able to pay 200 bucks for a Voodoo board shouldn't have problems to pay 250 or a few more bucks for this one. I'd rather buy a 2D card that offers me a first class 2D acceleration and a crisp and sharp picture, get a Voodoo2 board as well and feel happy for the next 12 months than buying a 2D/3D solution with questionable 2D abilities and only average 3D performance, that I want to get rid off within the next few months because I start crying looking at other people's Voodoo2 performance.

I guess you get the picture.

FOR full review go to:

tomshardware.com



To: larry oertel who wrote (1491)2/3/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 16960
 
This might be the same, then again, it might be different. I am do not think that we will see a large volume of sales for Voodoo2 based cards until the Canopus card is released. I am personally waiting for the Canopus version, as it has a 4,4,4 memory configuration (compared to the Monster 3D 2' 4,2,2) for the same price, forgoing the useless bundled software that most people already have.

tomshardware.com

TA