SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kech who wrote (737128)1/8/2021 5:41:56 PM
From: Bob2 Recommendations

Recommended By
alanrs
Thehammer

  Respond to of 793843
 
But if Perot and Bush were on the same time (sic, team) they would have beaten Clinton. There is a lesson there.

I have to disagree 100% in terms of the conclusion

We are past the point of agreeing with ANYTHING about the current GOP.
it is the UNI-Party - one with the Dems.

There is really no difference.

I would wager at least 80% of the current republican party would agree to form a Constitutional/Patriot Party
Couple that with the voters who voted for Perot, I think it was mainly libertarians, you still get that win.

What's that definition of insanity?
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome or result?



To: kech who wrote (737128)1/8/2021 6:09:40 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Respond to of 793843
 
There is a lesson there.

....yeah..........don't run third party candidates in a national election........Trump (or perhaps even some other Populist/Conservative candidate) proved he was more important as an alternative to the Ds............... not the R party................not clear to me even Cruz would have won as an R......although I think he would have done a better job............but had he not won.............it really wouldn't matter.