SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CentralParkRanger who wrote (191378)1/9/2021 12:44:25 AM
From: combjelly3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
Fast Eddie
Terry Maloney

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 355545
 
You do realize that similar reasoning was used to justify allowing the newly defeated South to implement Jim Crow? Just look at the events leading up to the election of 1876 and the Compromise of 1877. Note too that the history of appeasement shows that at best it kicks the can down the road and leads to growing violence.



To: CentralParkRanger who wrote (191378)1/9/2021 10:21:57 AM
From: Lane32 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 355545
 
74 Mln people voted from this POS. Do you think all of them are Nazis?
Millions of these people are scared and outraged.

Do you want these people in the streets with guns?


I cannot find the name of the investigative reporter, someone featured on either Rachel of The Eleventh Hour., who said the number was about 15 million of the 74 million. FWIW.



To: CentralParkRanger who wrote (191378)1/9/2021 1:27:00 PM
From: bentway2 Recommendations

Recommended By
rdkflorida2
Terry Maloney

  Respond to of 355545
 
I'm tired of those 74 million people. My 81 million people won the election, and they lost. They either accept that, or face the consequences.



To: CentralParkRanger who wrote (191378)1/9/2021 1:32:33 PM
From: Ron2 Recommendations

Recommended By
John Koligman
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 355545
 
Twitter warns of new violence to come, brewing again on social media, as reason for Trump ban

New research report, meanwhile, details planned events in Washington, Pittsburgh and every state capital

Twitter’s extraordinary action against President Trump on Friday night was driven both by the violent rampage of his supporters in Washington and what the company said was a looming “secondary attack” on the U.S. Capitol and state government facilities next weekend — a finding that tracks with the open threats of violence independent researchers have also found across the Web.

Calls for widespread protests on the days leading up to the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden have been rampant online for weeks. These demonstrations are scheduled to culminate with what organizers have dubbed a “Million Militia March” on Jan. 20 as Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala D. Harris are to be sworn in on the same Capitol grounds that rioters overran on Wednesday.

As with the online chatter ahead of that assault on the Capitol, these calls to action have bristled with violent talk and vows to bring guns to Washington in defiance of the city’s strict weapons laws. Twitter cited some of these posts in its announcement stripping Trump of his account and preventing him from creating new ones in the future. Some event listings are openly discussing delivering “justice” for Ashli Babbitt, a rioter and Air Force veteran who was fatally shot by police inside the Capitol on Wednesday.

“Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021,” Twitter’s announcement said, noting two recent Trump tweets it said were “likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021.”

Twitter bans Trump’s account, citing risk of further violence

Citing the potential for Trump’s words to incite others — even in the absence of clear references to violence — took Twitter’s enforcement actions to a restrictive new level, as commentators noted Friday night. But the fear that Trump’s social media postings were fueling violent action appears to be well founded by what researchers have detailed in their monitoring of far-right conversation online.

A detailed new analysis of such posts by Alethea Group, an organization combating disinformation that draws its name from the Greek word for “truth,” found abundant evidence of threatening plans on a range of platforms large and small. The aggressive and often hateful chatter has appeared on both mainstream sites such as Twitter and Facebook and niche, conservative sites such as TheDonald.win and Parler.

“REFUSE TO BE SILENCED,” said one online post cited by Alethea Group, calling for an “ARMED MARCH ON CAPITOL HILL & ALL STATE CAPITOLS” for Jan. 17, the last Sunday of Trump’s polarizing presidency. Another post calling for action at “DC & All State Capitols” and signed by “common folk who are tired of being tread upon” declares: “We were warned!”

“So much of the conversation right now is the general making of threats,” said Cindy Otis, vice president of analysis at Alethea. “There’s a risk of these particular dates leading to violence because that’s the kind of amped-up conversation we’re already seeing from people.”

Parler’s chief operating officer, Jeffrey Wernick, declined to comment. An unnamed moderator for TheDonald wrote an accusatory email in response to a request for comment that used an obscenity to describe Washington Post reporters but did not respond to the substance of the query.

The Alethea report lists events planned for Jan. 17, as well as the day before the inauguration and on Inauguration Day itself. The specified locations include the U.S. Capitol and the Mall in Washington, the Utah Capitol in Salt Lake City, and locations in Pittsburgh and Columbus, Ohio. Some events, including an “Armed March on All State Capitals,” include localized events in all 50 states.

Police let most Capitol rioters walk away. But cellphone data and videos could now lead to more arrests.

A post about the event in Pittsburgh included pictures of stockpiles of ammunition, the Alethea report said. An online militia forum called for recruits in Kentucky because “diplomatic efforts have been exhausted.”

“A popular guerilla onslaught is a nightmare for them,” said the anonymous writer of one post on the encrypted messaging service Telegram about the scattered militia events. “Is the military going to deploy in mass everywhere? They can’t.”

The report, while culled from public posts, also notes a shift toward communicating in closed, private groups on encrypted platforms such as Signal, suggesting there is significantly more organizing happening beyond the view of independent researchers and, likely, to authorities as well.

washingtonpost.com