Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: topwright who wrote (26581)	2/1/1998 8:58:00 AM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

The other excitement driver in FTEL appears to be the FNET IPO. It is my understanding that they want to obtain $ 100,000,000. How much are they planning to raise on this IPO? All $ 100,000,000 or only $ 20,000,000 or so since FTEL and friends will hold a lot of the shares after the IPO. The more I think about this IPO, the more questios I have. I hope that Raleigh, instead of attacking me with names, will join me in discussing and doucmenting these important questions. If this has been discussed before, then I apologize. If you could direct me to the posts, I'd appreciate it. In summary, I'm now looking at the two apparent value drivers of FTEL's stock recently: 1) The WCOM collocation 2) The FNET IPO Any information on those two subjects would be appreciated. PS I should mention the NASDAQ listing as a value-driver, but I feel that is an open and shut case. They will probably get listed; It appears to be a matter of when, not if, so there's really not much to say about that. VALUESPEC valuespec.com

To: topwright who wrote (26581)	2/1/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

Raleigh, Since you insist on me staying with my Ftel posts, I will co-operate. I am going to go back over your old predictions for Ftel's new products ( at the time they were announced ), and dissect them as they so deserve. I will point out to current and prospective shareholders how you predicted each new announcement would bring revenues to Ftel, and that now as we all know from Frank Peter's latest president's message ( sorry no link below, must go on my memory, Ftel's server seems to be experiencing difficulties ), those projects are now either abandoned or put on hold while Ftel completely reinvents itself once again. Hopefully, when my research is complete everyone will have a better perspective of your evaluation of Ftel's products. I request again that you use no derogatory comments when addressing me or my posts as I choose not to address you in that manner. Please remember the Terms of Service on SI. Tom

To: topwright who wrote (26581)	2/1/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: elk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Co_Locate or Collocation or Co-Location or COLOCATE all mean the same thing and the ignorance shown in the questions could all be easily answered if people simply researched that term. It's aamazing how people will keep asking quoestions, when they have been told where the answer lies. Well RB, you can lead a horse water, but you can't make him drink. I wonder if the horse is a gelding or a mare, or maybe pretends it is both><GGGGGGGGGGGGGG>. Thank you for that post. And I thought that I already knew how rich I was going to be, foolish me. In the last two days Thomas asked the quesion that certainly opened new doors for me. Why would WorldCom Collocate a Competitor in a combined 100 million dollar industry? Martin(thank you) has shown me yet another site, that has been incredibly enlightening, and enriching. Your last post said .02 net, is that correct? My Lord, this game is over. YYYYYYYIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!