SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (167386)1/20/2021 10:27:42 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218358
 
Re <<new administration is certainly putting a positive, upbeat spin on the situation>>

old administration counting up losses. Likely that a thank-you note is warranted if the old administration correct about the origin and intent of the virus accelerator

bloomberg.com

Trump Reveals Extent of Pandemic Damage to His Business Empire
Sophie Alexander



Outgoing President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump depart the White House on Jan. 20.

Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg
LISTEN TO ARTICLE
Donald Trump’s empire has been hit hard by coronavirus closures, with revenue from his Washington and Las Vegas hotels down by more than half.

In his last financial disclosure form as president, Trump detailed the damage the pandemic has wrought, at a time when many tourism businesses are suffering from a lack of travelers. As president, the real-estate magnate resisted policies to slow the pandemic through mask-wearing, and insisted it remained safe for people to travel domestically.



The Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Revenue from the Trump hotel in Washington, which he had been trying to sell, fell to $15.1 million from $40.5 million a year earlier, according to the disclosure posted Wednesday. In Vegas, hotel-related sales were down to $9.2 million from $23.3 million. Another important property of Trump’s, the Doral Golf Resort in Miami, also saw revenues drop to $44 million from $77 million a year earlier.

His golf courses in the U.K. and Ireland saw revenue drop by roughly two-thirds, part of a 27% overall decline in golfing revenue from the prior year.

Pandemic PressureOver the years, some of Trump's most important assets have seen revenue dip

Source: U.S. Office of Government Ethics Presidential Financial Disclosure Reports

Note: 2017 includes 15.5 months and 2021 includes 12.5 months.

Trump’s total income fell to between $273 million and $308 million, according to the form, which covers 2020 and the first 20 days of 2021. In his first financial disclosure in 2017, Trump reported making more than $528.9 million over 15 1/2 months, including his first three months as president.

One bright spot in Trump’s empire is his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, where the ex-president returned today after his final day in the White House. Revenue for the club hit $24.2 million, up from $21.4 million a year earlier, according to the financial disclosure. It’s one of Trump’s few properties that seems unaffected by the pandemic.



The Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.

Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

He also reported an uptick in online retail sales year-over-year, up to $1.96 million from $930,869 in 2019. However, in-store sales at Trump Tower in New York City fell because of forced closures -- down to $166,064 from $849,313.

In total, Trump valued the assets from his businesses at between $1.3 billion and $1.7 billion. The disclosures are not exact -- federal officials give the value of their assets and income in broad ranges, and the top value is “over $50 million.” Trump had 22 assets he listed in that range, including his Mar-a-Lago resort and the Trump International Hotel in Washington.

The form also details more than $40,000 in gifts Trump accepted in his last year in office, including freebies from executives at Boeing Co., Apple Inc. and Ford Motor Co.

Read more: Trump’s Shambolic Empire Faces Long Odds for One More Comeback

Trump is worth $2.5 billion, down about $500 million from when he took office, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. His buildings are saddled with more than $1 billion in debt, most of it coming due in the next three years and more than a third of it personally guaranteed.

— With assistance by Gregory Korte, and Tom Maloney

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167386)1/20/2021 10:32:04 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218358
 
life is complicated :0)

bloomberg.com

Steve Bannon’s Pardon Complicates Case Against Co-Defendants
Christian Berthelsen
21 January 2021, 04:43 GMT+8



Steve Bannon departs federal court in New York, on Aug. 20, 2020. Photographer: Mark Kauzlarich/BloombergDonald Trump’s midnight pardon of Steve Bannon complicates the case against the three other men charged with using border-wall donations for personal expenses.

The former chief White House strategist was the highest-profile person accused by Manhattan federal prosecutors in August of defrauding people who gave $25 million to the nonprofit We Build the Wall Inc. Though donors thought they were helping to fund private portions of Trump’s promised wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, the government says around $1 million of the money was used for travel and personal luxuries, including a Range Rover for Bannon.

Bannon, 67, and the other men said the prosecution was politically motivated and have denied wrongdoing. But some legal observers predicted the lesser-known defendants would eventually be persuaded to cooperate with the government and flip on Bannon. The pardon means the others are more likely cast Bannon as the architect of the scheme, experts said, knowing he can’t be harmed by their claims.

“If I were representing someone in that case, I would try to frame it as, ‘This is all Bannon’s doing,’ and blame Bannon,” said Harry Sandick, a criminal defense lawyer and former Manhattan federal prosecutor. “My key argument would be, ‘The real bad guy here was Steve Bannon.’ The case is better for the other defendants without Bannon than with him.”

‘98% Conviction Rate’John Meringolo, a lawyer for one of Bannon’s co-defendants, Timothy Shea, declined to say whether there would be a change in strategy.

“I am happy for Mr. Bannon,” said Meringolo. “Unfortunately the institution of the federal criminal justice system has a 98% conviction rate and a lot of innocent people go to jail. I hope that Mr. Shea can be exonerated.”

Lawyers for the other two defendants, Brian Kolfage and Andrew Badolato, did not respond to requests for comment on Wednesday. A lawyer for Bannon also didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The case may still prove tough for Bannon’s former co-defendants. Jed Shugerman, a law professor at Fordham University in New York, noted that the government had a large amount of evidence against the men, including emails and texts. Prosecutors could also summon Bannon to testify against them, though he could still invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination based on a hypothetical state prosecution. If he lies under oath, he can still be prosecuted for perjury.

Wild CardBut legal experts said any attempt to get Bannon to testify could be fraught for the government. While he could strengthen the case against the others, he might also prove a wild card for prosecutors, both in terms of what he says and how the jury reacts to him. Shugerman said it may not be worth the risk.

“This is the kind of case that prosecutors call a paper case, in that the documents are so clear,” said Shugerman. “The witness adds color and detail to the paper” but isn’t strictly necessary.

The latest in global politicsGet insight from reporters around the world in the Balance of Power newsletter.

According to the government, the four men told donors “100% of the funds raised” for We Build the Wall would be used for construction but began devising ways to launder funds for their own use soon after launching the charity. They made outsized payments to contractors who kicked a portion of the funds back to them and round-tripped some of the funds through a shell company. The effort has resulted in about five miles of border fencing in two different locations in Texas and New Mexico.

Trump went back and forth on whether to include Bannon in the raft of pardons and commutations he issued in his final hours in office. Though Bannon was one of the architects of Trump’s 2016 election victory, the two men clashed in the White House and had a falling-out after caustic comments by Bannon appeared in author Michael Wolff’s 2018 tell-all book “Fire and Fury.”

‘Sad Thing’Trump distanced himself from his former adviser at the time of his arrest, saying the case was a “sad thing for Mr. Bannon.”

Bannon sought to mend the fence with Trump in the last few months, playing a role in pushing a supposed scandal involving the business dealings of President Joe Biden’s son Hunter. In November, Bannon called for violence against Dr. Anthony Fauci and Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray over their perceived disloyalty to Trump. Bannon’s longtime lawyer withdrew from the case after the remarks.

Though he may out of the woods in one case, Bannon may soon be embroiled in another. According to an Aug. 20 Wall Street Journal report, a media venture he is pursuing with dissident Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, is facing a federal investigation over its $300 million private offering. Lawyers for Guo and the venture didn’t respond to requests for comment, but he and Bannon have toldthe Washington Post that the complaints that gave rise to the probe resulted from Guo’s criticisms of the Chinese government.

(Adds background on separate investigation involving Bannon)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167386)1/20/2021 10:34:58 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218358
 
... complicated especially as 'they' intend to get you and hard, just for the fun of it, as a hobby or exercise, or better, point-scoring game

almost as if better for bannon to have stormed into a single federal trial rather then 50 state trials, and all without cooperation from his alleged co-conspirators

lawandcrime.com

Legal Experts Brace for States to Prosecute Accused Money Launderer Steve Bannon

Steve Bannon’s overnight pardon by ex-President Donald Trump will almost certainly lead to state charges against the former White House Chief Strategist, several legal experts have predicted.

Unlike others on Trump’s lengthy overnight pardon list, Bannon’s name stands alone without support from others in positions of powers. Generally, pardons are explicitly endorsed by other elected officials and sometimes even prison officials who can vouch for an inmate’s post-conviction behavior as worthy of clemency. Bannon received no such endorsement but was instead praised by Trump for his “political acumen.” The White House also did not specify that Bannon was charged in connection with the “We Build the Wall” campaign, only calling that a “political project”:

Stephen K. Bannon – President Trump granted a full pardon to Stephen Bannon. Prosecutors pursued Mr. Bannon with charges related to fraud stemming from his involvement in a political project. Mr. Bannon has been an important leader in the conservative movement and is known for his political acumen.

The pardon was not well received by the bulk of the legal community. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig said there was “no legal prohibition on issuing pardons to friends and people who might be in a position to incriminate you unless there’s some exchange there, which could be bribery.” But Honig also called Bannon’s pardon both “self dealing” and a “favor to a crony.”

Honig said Bannon was “essentially ripping off donors” to We Build the Wall. He suggested Bannon may be in a position to incriminate Trump and wondered openly why other co-defendants charged along with Bannon were not pardoned along with Bannon.

Bannon, 66, of Washington, D.C., was charged along with Brian Kolfage, 38, of Miramar Beach, Fla.; Andrew Badolato, 56, of Sarasota, Fla.; and Timothy Shea, 49, of Castle Rock, Colo. with one count each of conspiracy to commit money laundering and one count each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The co-defendants did not receive clemency.

But Honig said Bannon’s case was straightforward and easily transferrable to the state courts — where Trump could not and cannot save Bannon from legal jeopardy.

“That’s a theft. Theft is a federal crime. It’s a crime in every state, including New York State,” Honig said. “So, if state prosecutors want to pick that case up, and they should. they can just walk right over to the SDNY, it’s a block a way, and ask for that file. They should do that, because it’s completely unjust that Steve Bannon gets a walk.”

Indeed, Occupy Democrats Editor Grant Stern said Florida authorities were moving forward with their own case:

Former DOJ attorney Michael Zeldin offered a slightly different ( and not entirely accurate) take about Bannon’s future, but still acknowledged the obvious legal reality that a president cannot issue a pardon for a state offense.

Outspoken attorney George Conway also chimed in, as did University of North Carolina law professor Carissa Byrne Hessick.

Federal prosecutors alleged that the defendants used proceeds from “We Build the Wall” to enrich themselves and to live lavish lifestyles.

At the time charges were filed, Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss of the Southern District of New York said “the defendants defrauded hundreds of thousands of donors, capitalizing on their interest in funding a border wall to raise millions of dollars, under the false pretense that all of that money would be spent on construction. While repeatedly assuring donors that Brian Kolfage, the founder and public face of We Build the Wall, would not be paid a cent, the defendants secretly schemed to pass hundreds of thousands of dollars to Kolfage, which he used to fund his lavish lifestyle.”

Bannon was arrested on a luxury yacht. Later, he got himself into hot water with his own lawyers by publicly fantasizing about putting the heads of Dr. Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray on “pikes” in the White House.

New York State Sen. Todd Kaminsky, a former federal prosecutor who issued the Empire State’s so-called “double jeopardy law,” encouraged prosecutions at the state level.

“Corrupt pardon power ends at the New York border,” Kaminsky said. “Thanks to legislation I authored and passed into law in 2019 that closed the ‘double jeopardy loophole,’ New York prosecutors can still pursue charges against Steve Bannon. Our law was specifically designed to address and prevent corrupt, politically-motivated pardons — just like this — to ensure that no one is above the law.”

New York’s “double jeopardy law” allows New York State “prosecutors to pursue state-level criminal charges against associates, staffers and family members of the President who received federal pardons,” a news release said.

[Image via Stephanie Keith/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? tips@lawandcrime.com



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167386)1/21/2021 12:26:41 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218358
 
Re <<new>>

... may be quite old, should they, or rather, once 'they' go overboard Message 33152605

zerohedge.com

"Even Libertarians": John Brennan Issues 'List' Of Ideologies Biden Intel Community Should Go After

Well this is alarming and ominous to say the least... Former CIA Director John Brennan told MSNBC in an interview on inauguration day that the intelligence community under newly sworn in President Biden is "moving in laser-like fashion" to try and uncover dangerous plots against the country.

Naturally, there's been much of this worrisome commentary about what political ideologies should be targeted and monitored coming out of NatSec hawks in the wake of the Capitol Hill mayhem of January 6. But this is the first time such a broad array of groups have been so bluntly lumped into a Pro-Trump "insurgency" by an influential media pundit and former spook. Brennan expressly said they are "violent" and remain a domestic threat.

He said in the MSNBC interview without the least concern for violation of Americans' rights that intelligence agencies should look into "religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians...".

He said these belief systems have come together under the umbrella of a supposed pro-Trump movement capable of committing violence.

Ah yes, "even libertarians"...

"I had white knuckles because of the nature of the threats," he began by recalling his days as CIA Director. We've seen "the growth of this polarization in the United States and domestic violence and White supremacist groups," he continued.

Comparing this "threat" to a foreign insurgency which the US has lately battled overseas, he said it

"brings together an unholy alliance of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians."

[url=][/url]

He added: "And unfortunately I think there’s been this momentum that generated as a result of unfortunately the demagogic rhetoric of people that’s just departed government, but also those who continue in the halls of Congress and so I really do think that the law enforcement, homeland security, intelligence, and even the defense officials are doing everything possible to root out what seems to be a very very serious and insidious threat to our democracy and our republic."

Interestingly, Brennan spoke as if these groups are already being looked into and spotlighted by US intelligence under Biden. "Even Libertarians," apparently.

Increasingly, it looks like Inauguration Day for intelligence insiders like Brennan represents "Deep State back on top" in America.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167386)1/21/2021 2:35:40 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218358
 
audit time ...

bloomberg.com

China Fails to Meet U.S. Trade Deal Target in 2020 Amid PandemicChina failed to meet its 2020 trade deal targets with the U.S. in a year marked by pandemic-related disruptions and an increasingly tense relationship with the Trump administration.

By the end of December, China had purchased about 58.1% of the $172 billion worth of goods it pledged to buy last year under the “phase one” agreement with Washington, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the country’s customs agency. It bought 60.4% of targeted manufactured products and 64.4% of agricultural goods, but lagged behind on energy, importing just 39% of the target.

Well Below TargetChina’s 2020 imports from the U.S. nowhere near the agreed target

Source: Bloomberg calculations based on official Chinese data



See detailed breakdown of purchases here

It’s no surprise that the annual target wasn’t met, since the monthly data had shown China was well behind on its purchase commitments all year. The latest figures show China sped up imports in December, especially of liquefied natural gas and vehicles, but that wasn’t enough to meet its goals.

Read More: China’s Imports of U.S. Gas Hit Record as Energy Crunch Eases

Under the agreement signed in January last year, China promised to buy an additional $200 billion of U.S. goods and services over the 2017 level by the end of 2021. As the pact enters its second year, all eyes are on whether a new U.S. administration under President Joe Biden will try to renegotiate the deal.

Biden told the New York Times last month he won’t make any immediate moves on tariffs on $360 billion worth of Chinese goods imposed by former President Donald Trump. Incoming officials have also signaled the new administration would continue to take a hard-line approach toward China, with Janet Yellen, Biden’s intended nominee for Treasury secretary, vowing to fight “abusive” trade practices.

Read more: How China Won Trump’s ‘Good and Easy to Win’ Trade War

The trade deal wasn’t a win for the U.S. as Trump had promised. The U.S. trade deficit with China grew to $317 billion last year, fueled by demand for medical goods and work-from-home devices, while research by some economists showed U.S. business and consumers paid for the higher tariffs, rather than Chinese companies.

— With assistance by James Mayger, Lin Zhu, and Molly Dai

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE