SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (435664)1/21/2021 10:22:00 PM
From: Graystone  Respond to of 436258
 
Intolerance of opposing viewpoints?
or
Losers trying to discredit due process

There is no opposing viewpoint, there is a group that rejects American law and American elections.
They are out of touch with reality, their minds are heavily sedated or comatose, they may be insane.
You are demonstrating the same symptoms, refusing to acknowledge a simple reality and clinging to a lie.
For one second just imagine that Trump is screwing around on Ivana with Marla Maples.
Think of his self serving lies when interviewed at the time, watch the old interviews.
Listen to the old Howard Stern shows, that is Donald Trump, lying, claiming to be John Barron.
Same boastful claims, the same lies that you have swallowed, that you believe, the ones that foul your gears.
These lies have fueled a crusade of hatred against America, against facts, against science, against reason.
He has always been a liar, you are listening to a liar, the people listening to that liar attacked their country.
They set out to capture and kill politicians they didn't like, they reject the American process.

To call this "opposition" is a symptom of a spell that for most, has broken, I am trying to help you.
Once you accept that Trump is habitual liar and begin to examine your claims you should be shocked.
Being suckered is difficult to accept and it happens to all of us all the time, it is embarrassing.
What happened wasn't opposition, it was a rejection of country, of law, of process.
To attempt to diminish that attack on America is to simply add to the threat, it was a vicious attack.
Thanks for quoting Sir Karl, he is very convincing.
Canada already has laws against the incitement of hatred, we listened.
You have two chances a day by your own admission, so you could try.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (435664)1/22/2021 8:30:55 AM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Like I said, I'm not going to argue ...