SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (167568)1/27/2021 4:52:49 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217734
 
outstanding new protocol ... doubtful that the typical American would tolerate the procedure

Gives new meaning to swabbing.

bloomberg.com

China’s Zero-Tolerance Covid Approach Now Includes Anal Swabs



Residents of Dongcheng District in Beijing line up for Covid-19 testing on Jan. 22. China’s lockdowns are also getting tougher, rivaling the severity of curbs placed on Wuhan a year ago.Photographer: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

China is ramping up efforts to neutralize the coronavirus as new outbreaks test its already stringent pandemic strategy, with another weapon added to an arsenal of border curbs, mass testing and hard lockdowns: anal swabs.

While there is no nationwide policy on use of the technique, some residents in China’s northern regions -- where the flare-up now amounts to more than 1,700 cases -- have been subjected to the anal swabs with little warning. It involves the insertion of a saline-soaked cotton swab about two-to-three centimeters into the anus, with the sample then tested for active traces of the virus.

More than 1,000 schoolchildren and teachers in Beijing were given anal, throat and nose swabs last week, along with a separate antibody test, after one asymptomatic virus case was detected on campus, according to local officials.



A medical worker collects a throat swab from a child in Beijing on Jan. 26. Scientists have found that some Covid-19 patients have active and prolonged gut viral infection.

Photographer: Shi Tielei/VCG/Getty Images

On Monday, passengers on a flight from Changchun, the capital city of Jilin province, to Beijing were told to disembark after officials discovered that someone from an area deemed as high risk for virus transmission was on board. They were then brought to a hotel where health workers took nose and anal swabs, said a passenger who asked to be identified only by his last name, Wang.

Some people arriving into Beijing are being asked to undertake anal swabs as well, with one traveler who came from Hong Kong a few weeks ago telling Bloomberg News she was told to do the swab herself while in mandatory hotel quarantine. The person, who didn’t want to be identified citing privacy concerns, also had to do three nose and throat tests, one blood test and her hotel room has been tested twice.

More Accurate

The day's biggest storiesGet caught up with the Evening Briefing.

Use of the new detection technique is based on research that traces of the virus found in the anus can last longer than in the respiratory tract, Li Tongzeng, deputy director of the respiratory and infectious disease department of Beijing You An Hospital said in an interview with state television last week. Anal swabs could be more accurate than throat and nose tests, he said, adding it was only being used on at-risk groups, including at quarantine sites.

Still, there’s no evidence that virus transmission is any more common among patients who test positive in the anus area, and anal swabbing has not been conducted in other places that have successfully achieved near-elimination of the pathogen, like New Zealand.

Since quelling its original outbreak in the central city of Wuhan last year, China has mounted a relentless drive to stamp out the coronavirus within its vast population, often deploying resources and powers that wouldn’t be viable or even countenanced in other countries.

While Western nations like the U.S. and U.K. still struggle with adequate virus testing, China is not just testing entire city populations every week, but also millions of frozen food imports and the containers that arrive in every day for minute traces of the pathogen. All incoming travelers are subject to multiple tests and lengthy quarantines.

That zeal, driven in part by local government officials concerned about repercussions should their cities become the next Wuhan, has worked at keeping outbreaks in check, but the use of techniques like anal swabbing is being questioned by some experts -- even in the country’s state-run media. So far, it appears to be only being used in the north, including the capital.

“I don’t understand why Beijing added anal swabs. It’s not like poking the throat. You need a certain place and the risk of such transmission routes is lower,” said Jiang Qingwu, a professor of epidemiology at the School of Public Health at Shanghai’s Fudan University. “Maybe they want to find remnants? It’s true that the virus can be detected there.”

Scientists have found that some Covid-19 patients have active and prolonged gut viral infection, even if they don’t manifest gastrointestinal symptoms. For such people, stool samples often test positive even a week after their respiratory samples have gone negative, researchers from the Chinese University of Hong Kong found.

Covid-19 May Cause Prolonged Gut Infection, Scientists Say

Tougher LockdownsChina’s capacity to endure disruption to business and everyday life in its ferocious fight against the coronavirus is a hallmark of its approach.

It’s the only country that has repeatedly detected traces of the virus on frozen food imports, with efforts that include disinfecting packaging adding to delays at ports, where containers of produce have been piling up. Local consumers are shunning foreign food for fear of infection, and China’s meat imports are projected to plunge as much as 30% this year from a record in 2020.

China’s lockdowns are also getting tougher, rivaling the severity of curbs placed on Wuhan a year ago even as case levels pale in comparison to elsewhere. China has reported just two Covid-19 deaths since April, and new infections at the height of the current flare-up number around 100 a day, compared with hundreds of thousands in the U.S.

Covid Lockdowns Are Spreading a Year After China Shocked World

In Tonghua, a city of 2 million people in Jilin province bordering North Korea, all residents have been banned from leaving their homes since Jan. 21 after 100 infections were detected. Some have complained on social media of insufficient food supplies after the sudden order, prompting an apology from local officials.

There are signs that the central government is trying to encourage some moderation.

An editorial from the Xinhua state news agency said Jan. 16 that local authorities should cease using the phrase “wartime measures” to describe their containment efforts. Such slogans could cause unnecessary panic, “paralyze people’s minds” and affect normal activities, the editorial said.



Disinfection of a market in the Daxing district of Beijing on Jan. 21. China is not only testing millions of people every week, but also tons of frozen food imports and the containers they arrive in every day for traces of the pathogen.

Photographer: Noel Celis/AFP/Getty Images

But with the Lunar New Year holiday approaching in mid-February, when officials expect 1.7 billion trips to be taken despite pleas for people to stay home, the wartime footing is likely to continue. The country is also doubling down on vaccination, with plans to inoculate 50 million people by the holiday with locally-developed vaccines.

See how China fares in Bloomberg’s vaccine tracker

“We don’t tolerate the virus circulating. Once we find it, we immediately quash it and outbreaks are not allowed,” said Lu Hongzhou, an infectious disease physician who advises both the central and Shanghai governments on Covid-19 treatment.

“Our country has always pursued this strategy and it can’t be adjusted.”

— With assistance by John Liu, Claire Che, Dong Lyu, and Jinshan Hong

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167568)1/27/2021 5:44:22 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217734
 
watch & brief

to see how a continent might be saddled w/ very costly and piecemeal infrastructure

w/ the ultimate consequence we might extrapolate, for it should be just simple mathematics and historical analogies re-applied

ft.com

Why Ericsson took on its own government to defend rival Huawei

Intervention by Swedish telecoms equipment lays bare geopolitical pressures facing businesses
6 hours ago
Ericsson chief executive Borje Ekholm texted a government minister after Sweden’s decision to ban Huawei © REUTERSA company acting under pressure from China, or one standing up for free trade and a global internet?

The extraordinary sight of Ericsson, the Swedish telecoms equipment maker, squaring up to its own government in support of its Chinese arch-rival Huawei has laid bare the intense geopolitical tensions facing some businesses.

Borje Ekholm, Ericsson’s chief executive, had already raised eyebrows in November when he criticised Sweden’s decision to ban Huawei from its 5G networks, saying in an interview with the Financial Times that the move restricted free trade and competition.

But in private he went even further. Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter this month revealed text messages sent by Mr Ekholm to a government minister in Stockholm in which the chief executive said of the ban: “As it looks right now, Sweden is a really bad country for Ericsson.” He added that in his situation “you fully understand why Europe has very few tech companies”.

Anna Hallberg, Sweden’s minister for foreign trade, must have sensed an implicit threat to leave Sweden as she replied that the country was a good place for a global company to have its headquarters.

It’s tragic in a sense that he has to plead with Swedish ministers to do something, otherwise Ericsson will be harmed

Elisabeth Braw, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute
So was Mr Ekholm merely fighting his corner, or was his lobbying of his own government on behalf of Huawei a sign of how China manages to exert influence on large multinationals?

Sweden’s decision to ban Huawei was unusual in several respects. Sweden has a model of having strong independent regulatory agencies, as evidenced in its controversial approach to the Covid-19 pandemic. So the Huawei decision was not taken directly by the national government. Instead, it was made by its telecoms regulator on the advice of its security services and armed forces, which warned that China was involved in “extensive intelligence gathering and theft of technology, research and development”.

But the decision also stood out because, instead of mentioning vague national security concerns for the ban as other European countries had done, Sweden set out the worries of its intelligence services explicitly.

For Mr Ekholm, Sweden could have achieved the same end-result of barring Huawei from its networks but in a more subtle manner that protected Ericsson and other Swedish companies from retribution. Indeed, Chinese authorities warned within days of the announcement that there would be a “negative impact” on Swedish companies.

Ericsson’s chief executive also argued that other things were at risk. He told the FT that Huawei was not just a competitor but a partner in setting global standards for networks. Inside the Swedish company there is a worry that the global telecoms operating system could be at risk, at a time when China and other parts of Asia are ahead in 5G.

However, others argue that Ericsson might have been threatened by the might of a China where it sells far more network gear than, for instance, in Sweden. Elisabeth Braw, a Swede who is resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, notes that Mr Ekholm appeared to confirm to Dagens Nyheter he had felt pressure from Chinese authorities on the matter.

Recommended





“It’s tragic in a sense that he has to plead with Swedish ministers to do something, otherwise Ericsson will be harmed,” she says.

For Ms Braw, western governments need to up their game to better support their companies from potential threats from China and elsewhere. “If you’re the government of Sweden or Finland or the UK or Germany, you now have the responsibility to help your companies, otherwise they may not be your companies any more,” she argues.

Mr Ekholm’s complaints underscored the piecemeal nature of many European countries’ approach to Huawei, China and broader technology matters. There is little sense of a joined-up policy on how to deal with the threat from China or support domestic companies.

Several European countries, including the UK, have talked about finding other network gear suppliers to reduce the risks of depending too much on Ericsson and Nokia. That contrasts with the US where the Trump administration had floated the idea of taking a stake in one or both of the Nordic duo.

The stakes are high: China’s support of Huawei, through cheap funding and much else, is well known, and has led to a commercial advantage that Ericsson and Nokia can find hard to counter on their own. Will Europe, for which 5G is a rare technological sector where it enjoys a clear lead over the US, stand up for its homegrown talent?

richard.milne@ft.com



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167568)4/13/2021 4:59:47 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217734
 
Re <<NAK appeal timeline...>>

It would seem, on casual and ocular inspection, the Democrats led by Team Biden, has sold you and your neighbours down the river, and unlike in the case of NAK, appeal unlikely

the only hope, is that a spontaneous and true community of like-minded can shame the Japanese officialdom into doing the correction actions

sushi or sashimi? crab or lobster, or salmon or tuna?

safecast.org



I suppose Team China can charge Team Japan with state-sponsored environmental terrorism, and take further appropriate action.
South Korea said they posed a risk to the marine environment and the safety of neighboring countries, while China said it reserved the right to take further action.

bloomberg.com

U.S. Friends Join China in Ripping Japan Plan on Fukushima Water
Aaron Clark
13 April 2021, 07:14 GMT+8
Sign up for the Bloomberg Green newsletter, your guide to the latest in climate news, zero-emission tech and green finance.

U.S. partners South Korea and Taiwan joined China in opposing Japan’s plan to release more than a million cubic meters of radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean starting in about two years.

The three Asian governments, all with coastlines nearby, swiftly criticized Japan’s announcement Tuesday that it would conduct controlled releases that are expected to last for several decades. South Korea said they posed a risk to the marine environment and the safety of neighboring countries, while China said it reserved the right to take further action.

Japan will begin releasing more than a million cubic meters of treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean in about two years, splitting the U.S. from other Asian allies that joined China in condemning the move.

China, South Korea and Taiwan all swiftly issued statements criticizing the controlled releases over the next few decades, with Beijing saying they posed a risk to the marine environment and the safety of neighboring countries.

The U.S., on the other hand, said the approach appeared to be in line with global standards while the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the global body would help ensure the plan is carried out “without an adverse impact on human health and the environment.”

“Disposing of the treated water is an unavoidable issue for decommissioning the Fukushima nuclear power plant,” Japan Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said.



Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant seen from Tomioka, Fukushima Prefecture, on March 7.

Photographer: Toru Hanai/Bloomberg

The decision ends years of debate over how to dispose of the water, which is enough to fill more than 500 Olympic-sized swimming pools. It has been leaking into the reactors that suffered core meltdowns after an earthquake and tsunami in 2011.

The U.S. backing comes as Suga prepares to become the first foreign leader to hold an in-person summit with President Joe Biden in Washington ahead of a climate conference, where Japan may announce new 2030 emissions reduction targets. To meet its vow to be carbon neutral by 2050, some government officials contend Japan will need to restart almost every nuclear reactor it shuttered in the aftermath of the 2011 meltdowns, and then build more.

“We thank Japan for its transparent efforts in its decision to dispose of the treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi site,” U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Twitter.

Discharges are common practice in the industry, and Japan has said the releases will meet global guidelines. A panel within Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry recommended last year the water be released into the ocean or evaporated. The proposal stipulated that any water released into the environment must be re-purified and diluted to meet standards, and that the discharges take place over decades, according to a December 2019 report from METI.

While Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings Inc. cycles in water to keep fuel and debris cool at the Fukushima site, fresh groundwater flows in daily and becomes contaminated. That water is pumped out and cleaned in a process that removes most of the radioactive elements except for tritium. Then it’s stored in one of roughly 1,000 tanks at the site, which are forecast to be full by mid-2022.

Read more: Why Japan Is Dumping Water From Fukushima in the Sea: QuickTake

Greenpeace criticized Japan’s plan to release the treated Fukushima water into the ocean and said there are other options that should be considered.

“Rather than using the best available technology to minimize radiation hazards by storing and processing the water over the long term, they have opted for the cheapest option, dumping the water into the Pacific Ocean,” the group said.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a report in April 2020 that METI’s recommendations were “based on a sufficiently comprehensive analysis and on a sound scientific and technical basis.”

Taiwan’s Atomic Energy Council expressed regret about the decision, saying it had expressed opposition to the plan earlier. The body in Taipei said it set up 33 monitoring spots in waters nearby Taiwan to assess any impact of radioactivity.

Hu Xijin, an editor at the Communist Party-backed Global Times newspaper, said the U.S. approved of the plan “to cement Japan’s loyalty.”

“The U.S. thinks it’s far from Japan and has the least risk,” he wrote on Twitter. “But ocean currents mean it will face the same risk in future.”

— With assistance by Isabel Reynolds

(Updates with details throughout.)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Snowshoe who wrote (167568)1/31/2023 1:54:22 PM
From: Snowshoe2 Recommendations

Recommended By
maceng2
marcher

  Respond to of 217734
 
EPA pulls the plug on Pebble Mine

January 31, 2023

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved to decisively protect the Bristol Bay watershed under the Clean Water Act, capping more than a decade of a struggle between fishing and environmental groups and would-be developers of the Pebble Mine project.

The EPA’s “final determination” is aimed at protecting the world’s most productive wild salmon fishery from “disposal of dredged or fill materials associated with developing the Pebble deposit,” according to the agency.



“The Bristol Bay watershed is a vital economic driver, providing jobs, sustenance, and significant ecological and cultural value to the region,” said EPA Administrator Michael Regan in announcing the decision early Tuesday morning. “With this action, EPA is advancing its commitment to help protect this one-of-a-kind ecosystem, safeguard an essential Alaskan industry, and preserve the way of life for more than two dozen Alaska Native villages.”

Full story: nationalfisherman.com