Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doo who wrote (466243)	1/26/2021 1:24:11 PM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542936

I like how you used the Ad Verecundiam fallacy, arguing that a person of authority MUST be right. If all our courts acted the same, that is, waited until the lawsuit is meaningless, think of what would happen. A person who wins a lawsuit against a corporation would never get his case before the court until after he's dead and then the court would say it's moot.

To: Doo who wrote (466243)	1/26/2021 2:01:36 PM
From: JohnM	1 Recommendation Recommended By abuelita Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542936

Good points.

To: Doo who wrote (466243)	1/26/2021 2:06:42 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542936

I am not familiar with the issue at hand. I know Tribe is the one to believe, so what did he say, if you don't mind, about the emoluments clause? Is there any question Trump committed crimes in regard to that? Just asking. I am pretty old myself :)>. TIA. <<Do you know who Laurence Tribe is? He was part of the suit, perhaps the foremost constitutional law expert this country has ever seen, and he has zero issue with the emoluments case having been dismissed as moot. Why would that be if any of your accusations were valid?