Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (192613)	1/27/2021 5:28:14 PM
From: Dracin72	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358654

I agree CJ. The House did in fact impeach Trump while in office. The trial is an outcome of the impeachment of a "sitting" President in this case. How far the Senate has fallen. Not such an impartial or dignified body the founders once thought. The Federalist , No. 65, he argued: The Convention thought the Senate the most fit depository of this important trust. Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent? What other body would be likely to feel confidence enough in its own situation, to preserve unawed and uninfluenced the necessary impartiality between an individual accused, and the representatives of the people, his accusers? senate.gov.