SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree (CKFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TQR who wrote (1468)2/2/1998 1:23:00 AM
From: TLindt  Respond to of 8545
 
To Tlindt on the SI Thread [from Yahoo! MSG Board--baga01]

Welcome to the poor man's SI thread...I'm waiting until I make enought money in Checkfree before I can justify the $150 for the SI thread. I've been following the CheckFree thread on SI for about a year.

In response to Cobol?...

I've been a mainframe programmer for 10 years, and from what I can tell, CheckFree is building a state of the art Mainframe in Atlanta. For transaction processing there is No other way to go(then need for speed), other than the Mainframe. In fact I believe they are implementing a Parallel Sysplex (OS390), which allows 24x7, and allows connections to Web Servers as well as Unix Servers. When your talking transactions, you talking Speed! Cobol2 is the standard for the mainframe, the only other language is Assembler (which is a little faster, but all the Assembler programers have retired (except for me)). Feel free to post this on the SI thread, and thanks for the mention. Go CheckFree!

PS. This is why MS partnered with FDC, MS doesn't own any mainframes
..........................................................................................

Cheers Boys! They're blowing the doors off the Asian Markets Tonight!



To: TQR who wrote (1468)2/2/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: Spots  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8545
 
<<< Both Cobol and DB2 are matured technologies with absolutely
no downside risk. >>>

>> This is true.

With apologies to those who differ, I can't agree.
There's big future risk. These technologies are
nearing the ends of their lifecycles. Obsolescence and
future talent will both be major problems. I'm sorry
to hear it.