Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamie153 who wrote (153089)	1/29/2021 12:03:49 PM
From: yard_man	2 Recommendations Recommended By Alias Shrugged Hugh Bett Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219134

I see the POV below -- but think it misses the larger point. >> This is what tax cuts did to us. << But for me it is a sub-text of the larger problem which is: We have a government that we cannot afford. However it is done -- for people to be free -- it must be done -- government expenditures cannot forever exceed revenues. They must MATCH. More specifically and more necessary at present, the gap between expenditures and revenues cannot accelerate forever. Where we differ: Government is too dmn big by at least 100x. The real solution is not a diet but a thorough gutting of the useless parts of it. The economy can certainly survive without a department of Education, a department of Energy, a department of Homeland security ... I could go on. It is just too dmn big!!